School of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, UK.
School of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, UK.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Mar;44:60-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.12.003. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
The factor structure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been widely researched, but consensus regarding the exact number and nature of factors is yet to be reached. The aim of the current study was to systematically review the extant literature on PTSD's latent structure in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) in order to identify the best-fitting model. One hundred and twelve research papers published after 1994 using confirmatory factor analysis and DSM-based measures of PTSD were included in the review. In the DSM-IV literature, four-factor models received substantial support, but the five-factor Dysphoric arousal model demonstrated the best fit, regardless of gender, measurement instrument or trauma type. The recently proposed DSM-5 PTSD model was found to be a good representation of PTSD's latent structure, but studies analysing the six- and seven-factor models suggest that the DSM-5 PTSD factor structure may need further alterations.
创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的因素结构已经得到了广泛的研究,但对于确切的因素数量和性质尚未达成共识。本研究的目的是系统地回顾《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM)中 PTSD 潜在结构的现有文献,以确定最合适的模型。本研究共纳入了 1994 年后发表的 112 篇使用验证性因子分析和基于 DSM 的 PTSD 测量方法的研究论文。在 DSM-IV 文献中,四因素模型得到了大量支持,但无论性别、测量工具或创伤类型如何,五因素的苦恼唤醒模型都表现出了最好的拟合。最近提出的 DSM-5 PTSD 模型被认为是 PTSD 潜在结构的良好代表,但分析六因素和七因素模型的研究表明,DSM-5 PTSD 因素结构可能需要进一步修改。