Berthelsen Connie Bøttcher, Hølge-Hazelton Bibi
Orthopedic Department, Regional Hospital Køge, Køge, Denmark.
Section of Nursing, Institute of Health, Aarhus C, Denmark.
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Mar;25(5-6):846-55. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13128. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
To describe the orthopaedic nurses' experiences regarding the relevance of an educational intervention and their personal and contextual barriers to participation in the intervention.
One of the largest barriers against nurses' research usage in clinical practice is the lack of participation. A previous survey identified 32 orthopaedic nurses as interested in participating in nursing research. An educational intervention was conducted to increase the orthopaedic nurses' research knowledge and competencies. However, only an average of six nurses participated.
A triangulation convergence model was applied through a mixed methods design to combine quantitative results and qualitative findings for evaluation.
Data were collected from 2013-2014 from 32 orthopaedic nurses in a Danish regional hospital through a newly developed 21-item questionnaire and two focus group sessions. Data were first analysed using descriptive statistics (stata 12.0) and qualitative manifest content analysis. Second, the results were compared, contrasted and interpreted using international literature.
The nurses experienced the intervention as a new way to focus on nursing research in practice. However, some nurses were not able to see the relevance of research usage in clinical practice. Nursing research was not a top priority for the nurses and their personal barriers for research usage during their working day were prioritising patients' and colleagues' well-being. Their colleagues' and head section nurses' lack of acceptance regarding participation in the teaching session was a contextual barrier for the nurses.
The nurses were interested in participating in the intervention. However, some felt restricted by the research-practice gap and by diverse personal and contextual barriers.
The knowledge derived from this study has high clinical and practical relevance and is currently used to facilitate the nurses' research usage in the orthopaedic department setting, by working around the perceived barriers.
描述骨科护士对于一项教育干预相关性的体验,以及她们参与该干预的个人和环境障碍。
护士在临床实践中运用研究成果的最大障碍之一是缺乏参与度。此前一项调查确定有32名骨科护士有兴趣参与护理研究。开展了一项教育干预以提高骨科护士的研究知识和能力。然而,平均只有6名护士参与。
采用混合方法设计应用三角收敛模型,将定量结果和定性发现相结合进行评估。
2013年至2014年期间,通过一份新编制的包含21个条目的问卷和两次焦点小组会议,从丹麦一家地区医院的32名骨科护士收集数据。首先使用描述性统计(Stata 12.0)和定性显内容分析法对数据进行分析。其次,运用国际文献对结果进行比较、对比和解读。
护士们将该干预体验为一种在实践中关注护理研究的新方式。然而,一些护士无法认识到在临床实践中运用研究成果的相关性。护理研究并非护士们的首要任务,她们在工作日使用研究成果的个人障碍是优先考虑患者和同事的福祉。同事和科室护士长对参与教学会议缺乏认可,这是护士面临的环境障碍。
护士们有兴趣参与该干预。然而,一些人感到受到研究与实践差距以及各种个人和环境障碍的限制。
本研究获得的知识具有很高的临床和实践相关性,目前正用于通过克服感知到的障碍,促进护士在骨科环境中运用研究成果。