Suppr超能文献

颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术的最新进展。

Recent advances in carotid angioplasty and stenting.

作者信息

Calvet David, Mas Jean-Louis

机构信息

Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Université Paris-Descartes, INSERM U894, DHU Neurovasc-Paris Sorbonne, Paris, France.

Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Université Paris-Descartes, INSERM U894, DHU Neurovasc-Paris Sorbonne, Paris, France jl.mas@ch-sainte-anne.

出版信息

Int J Stroke. 2016 Jan;11(1):19-27. doi: 10.1177/1747493015616637.

Abstract

Atherosclerotic carotid stenosis accounts for about 15% of ischemic strokes. Carotid endarterectomy reduces the risk of stroke in patients with severe carotid stenosis. Carotid artery stenting has emerged as a potentially less invasive alternative to carotid endarterectomy. However, randomized clinical trials in patients with symptomatic stenosis have shown that carotid artery stenting is associated with a higher risk of peri-procedural stroke compared with carotid endarterectomy. Carotid artery stenting is associated with a lower risk of peri-procedural myocardial infarction and local complications (cranial nerve palsies, access site hematoma) and appears to be as durable as carotid endarterectomy in terms of long-term protection against ipsilateral stroke and risk of restenosis. The main risk factors for peri-procedural stroke in patients treated with carotid artery stenting are age >70 years and high burden of white-matter lesions on brain imaging. Patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis receiving modern medical treatment have a low risk (<1%/year) of ipsilateral stroke and it is uncertain whether the benefit of revascularization still justifies the procedural risk of stroke or death. In particular, the small excess of procedural risk of stroke associated with carotid artery stenting (compared with carotid endarterectomy) may offset the small benefit (if any) of carotid endarterectomy versus medical therapy in unselected patients. Randomized clinical trials are ongoing to solve this issue.

摘要

动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉狭窄约占缺血性卒中的15%。颈动脉内膜切除术可降低重度颈动脉狭窄患者的卒中风险。颈动脉支架置入术已成为一种潜在的侵入性较小的替代颈动脉内膜切除术的方法。然而,针对有症状狭窄患者的随机临床试验表明,与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,颈动脉支架置入术与围手术期卒中风险较高相关。颈动脉支架置入术与围手术期心肌梗死和局部并发症(脑神经麻痹、穿刺部位血肿)风险较低相关,并且在预防同侧卒中和再狭窄风险的长期保护方面似乎与颈动脉内膜切除术一样持久。接受颈动脉支架置入术治疗的患者围手术期卒中的主要危险因素是年龄>70岁和脑成像显示白质病变负担较重。接受现代药物治疗的无症状颈动脉狭窄患者同侧卒中风险较低(<1%/年),目前尚不确定血运重建的益处是否仍能证明卒中或死亡的手术风险是合理的。特别是,与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,颈动脉支架置入术相关的卒中手术风险略有增加,这可能会抵消在未选择的患者中颈动脉内膜切除术相对于药物治疗的微小益处(如果有的话)。正在进行随机临床试验以解决这个问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验