Gwenzi Willis, Mupatsi Nyarai M
Biosystems and Environmental Engineering Research Group, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Engineering, University of Zimbabwe, P.O. Box MP167, Mt. Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Biosystems and Environmental Engineering Research Group, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Engineering, University of Zimbabwe, P.O. Box MP167, Mt. Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Waste Manag. 2016 Mar;49:114-123. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.12.029. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
Application of coal ash in construction materials is constrained by the potential risk of heavy metal leaching. Limited information is available on the comparative heavy metal leaching from coal ash-versus conventional concrete. The current study compared total and leached heavy metal concentrations in unbound coal ash, cement and sand; and investigated the effect of initial leachant pH on heavy metal leaching from coal-ash versus conventional concrete monoliths and their debris. Total Pb, Mn and Zn in coal ash were lower than or similar to that of other materials, while Cu and Fe showed the opposite trend. Leached concentrations of Zn, Pb, Mn, Cu and Fe in unbound coal ash, its concrete and debris were comparable and in some cases even lower than that for conventional concrete. In all cases, leached concentrations accounted for just <1% of the total concentrations. Log-log plots of concentration and cumulative release of Fe versus time based on tank leaching data showed that leaching was dominated by diffusion. Overall, the risk of Zn, Pb, Mn, Cu and Fe leaching from coal ash and its concrete was minimal and comparable to that of conventional concrete, a finding in contrast to widely held public perceptions and earlier results reported in other regions such as India. In the current study the coal ash, and its concrete and debris had highly alkaline pH indicative of high acid neutralizing and pH buffering capacity, which account for the stabilization of Zn, Pb, Mn, Cu and Fe. Based on the low risk of Zn, Pb, Mn, Cu and Fe leaching from the coal ash imply that such coal ash can be incorporated in construction materials such as concrete without adverse impacts on public and environmental health from these constituents.
煤灰在建筑材料中的应用受到重金属浸出潜在风险的限制。关于煤灰与传统混凝土中重金属浸出情况对比的信息有限。本研究比较了未结合的煤灰、水泥和沙子中重金属的总量及浸出量;并研究了初始浸出液pH值对煤灰与传统混凝土块体及其碎片中重金属浸出的影响。煤灰中铅、锰和锌的总量低于或与其他材料相近,而铜和铁则呈现相反趋势。未结合的煤灰、其制成的混凝土及其碎片中锌、铅、锰、铜和铁的浸出浓度相当,在某些情况下甚至低于传统混凝土。在所有情况下,浸出浓度仅占总浓度的不到1%。基于槽式浸出数据绘制的铁浓度和累积释放量与时间的双对数图表明,浸出过程以扩散为主。总体而言,煤灰及其制成的混凝土中锌、铅、锰、铜和铁的浸出风险极小,与传统混凝土相当,这一发现与公众普遍认知以及印度等其他地区早期报道的结果形成对比。在本研究中,煤灰及其制成的混凝土和碎片具有高碱性pH值,表明其具有高酸中和及pH缓冲能力,这解释了锌、铅、锰、铜和铁的稳定性。基于煤灰中锌、铅、锰、铜和铁的低浸出风险,意味着这种煤灰可掺入混凝土等建筑材料中,而不会因其成分对公众和环境健康产生不利影响。