Menclová K, Bělina F, Pudil J, Langer D, Ryska M
Rozhl Chir. 2015 Dec;94(12):516-21.
Many previous reports have focused on bile leakage after liver resection. Despite the improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative care the incidence of this complication rather keeps increasing. A number of predictive factors have been analyzed. There is still no consensus regarding their influence on the formation of bile leakage. The objective of our analysis was to evaluate the incidence of bile leakage, its impact on mortality and duration of hospitalization at our department. At the same time, we conducted an analysis of known predictive factors.
The authors present a retrospective review of the set of 146 patients who underwent liver resection at the Department of Surgery of the 2nd Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University and Central Military Hospital Prague, performed between 20102013. We used the current ISGLS (International Study Group of Liver Surgery) classification to evaluate the bile leakage. The severity of this complication was determined according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Statistical significance of the predictive factors was determined using Fishers exact test and Students t-test.
The incidence of bile leakage was 21%. According to ISGLS classification the A, B, and C rates were 6.5%, 61.2%, and 32.3%, respectively. The severity of bile leakage according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system - I-II, IIIa, IIIb, IV and V rates were 19.3%, 42%, 9.7%, 9.7%, and 19.3%, respectively. We determined the following predictive factors as statistically significant: surgery for malignancy (p<0.001), major hepatic resection (p=0.001), operative time (p<0.001), high intraoperative blood loss (p=0.02), construction of HJA (p=0.005), portal venous embolization/two-stage surgery (p=0.009) and ASA score (p=0.02). Bile leakage significantly prolonged hospitalization time (p<0.001). In the group of patients with bile leakage the perioperative mortality was 23 times higher (p<0.001) than in the group with no leakage.
Bile leakage is one of the most serious complications of liver surgery. Most of the risk factors are not easily controllable and there is no clear consensus on their influence. Intraoperative leak tests could probably reduce the incidence of bile leakage. In the future, further studies will be required to improve the perioperative management and techniques to prevent such serious complications. Multidisciplinary approach is essential in the treatment.
此前已有许多报告聚焦于肝切除术后胆漏问题。尽管手术技术和围手术期护理有所改进,但该并发症的发生率仍在上升。已对一些预测因素进行了分析。关于它们对胆漏形成的影响仍未达成共识。我们分析的目的是评估我院胆漏的发生率、其对死亡率和住院时间的影响。同时,我们对已知的预测因素进行了分析。
作者对2010年至2013年期间在布拉格查理大学第二医学院外科和中央军事医院接受肝切除的146例患者进行了回顾性研究。我们采用当前的国际肝脏手术研究组(ISGLS)分类来评估胆漏情况。根据Clavien-Dindo分类系统确定该并发症的严重程度。使用Fisher精确检验和学生t检验确定预测因素的统计学意义。
胆漏发生率为21%。根据ISGLS分类,A、B和C级发生率分别为6.5%、61.2%和32.3%。根据Clavien-Dindo分类系统,胆漏的严重程度——I-II级、IIIa级、IIIb级、IV级和V级发生率分别为19.3%、4..2%、9.7%、9.7%和19.3%。我们确定以下预测因素具有统计学意义:恶性肿瘤手术(p<0.001)、肝大部切除术(p=0.001)、手术时间(p<0.001)、术中失血量大(p=0.02)、肝门空肠吻合术的构建(p=0.005)、门静脉栓塞/分期手术(p=0.009)和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分(p=0.02)。胆漏显著延长了住院时间(p<0.001)。胆漏组患者的围手术期死亡率比无胆漏组高23倍(p<0.001)。
胆漏是肝脏手术最严重的并发症之一。大多数风险因素不易控制,且关于它们的影响尚无明确共识。术中漏液试验可能会降低胆漏的发生率。未来,需要进一步研究以改善围手术期管理和技术,预防此类严重并发症。多学科方法在治疗中至关重要。