Ruan Hailin, Ge Wenhan, Li Bing, Zhu Yuanqun, Yang Fan
Department of Emergency, Liuzhou Worker's Hospital, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University Liuzhou, Guangxi 545005, P.R China.
Department of Intensive Care Unit, Huaian Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical College Huai'an, Jiangshu 223002, P.R China.
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Oct 15;8(10):19114-9. eCollection 2015.
The aim of this study was to determine the application value of a trauma index (TI) to assess condition and likelihood of death in hospitalized patients with acute trauma (AT).
Trauma index scores and injury severity scores (ISS) were assessed in 1,802 randomly selected cases of AT-hospitalized patients. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the clinical values of TI and ISS values to predict outcomes in AT-hospitalized patients.
The area under the ROC curve for TI scores was 0.896 (95% CI [0.881, 0.909]), while for ISS, it was 0.792 (95% CI [0.773, 0.811]). This difference was not statistically significant (z = 3.236, P = 0.001). Potentially critical disease conditions in AT-hospitalized patients were best identified when TI scores were ≥ 16 points and ISS values were ≥ 22 points.
Trauma Index scores exhibited a higher resolution for outcome prediction in AT-hospitalized patients compared to ISS values. The implementation of this scale was simple, reliable, easy to learn, and could quickly identify disease, which is vital for early detection and treatment of critical trauma patients.
本研究旨在确定创伤指数(TI)在评估急性创伤(AT)住院患者病情及死亡可能性方面的应用价值。
对1802例随机选取的AT住院患者进行创伤指数评分和损伤严重程度评分(ISS)。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线比较TI和ISS值预测AT住院患者预后的临床价值。
TI评分的ROC曲线下面积为0.896(95%CI[0.881,0.909]),而ISS的ROC曲线下面积为0.792(95%CI[0.773,0.811])。这种差异无统计学意义(z = 3.236,P = 0.001)。当TI评分≥16分且ISS值≥22分时,能最好地识别AT住院患者潜在的危急病情。
与ISS值相比,创伤指数评分在预测AT住院患者预后方面具有更高的分辨率。该量表实施简单、可靠、易于学习,能快速识别病情,对危重伤员的早期发现和治疗至关重要。