Suppr超能文献

应用创伤指数评估急性创伤住院患者的损伤严重程度及预后。

The application of a trauma index to assess injury severity and prognosis in hospitalized patients with acute trauma.

作者信息

Ruan Hailin, Ge Wenhan, Li Bing, Zhu Yuanqun, Yang Fan

机构信息

Department of Emergency, Liuzhou Worker's Hospital, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University Liuzhou, Guangxi 545005, P.R China.

Department of Intensive Care Unit, Huaian Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical College Huai'an, Jiangshu 223002, P.R China.

出版信息

Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Oct 15;8(10):19114-9. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the application value of a trauma index (TI) to assess condition and likelihood of death in hospitalized patients with acute trauma (AT).

METHODS

Trauma index scores and injury severity scores (ISS) were assessed in 1,802 randomly selected cases of AT-hospitalized patients. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the clinical values of TI and ISS values to predict outcomes in AT-hospitalized patients.

RESULTS

The area under the ROC curve for TI scores was 0.896 (95% CI [0.881, 0.909]), while for ISS, it was 0.792 (95% CI [0.773, 0.811]). This difference was not statistically significant (z = 3.236, P = 0.001). Potentially critical disease conditions in AT-hospitalized patients were best identified when TI scores were ≥ 16 points and ISS values were ≥ 22 points.

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma Index scores exhibited a higher resolution for outcome prediction in AT-hospitalized patients compared to ISS values. The implementation of this scale was simple, reliable, easy to learn, and could quickly identify disease, which is vital for early detection and treatment of critical trauma patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定创伤指数(TI)在评估急性创伤(AT)住院患者病情及死亡可能性方面的应用价值。

方法

对1802例随机选取的AT住院患者进行创伤指数评分和损伤严重程度评分(ISS)。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线比较TI和ISS值预测AT住院患者预后的临床价值。

结果

TI评分的ROC曲线下面积为0.896(95%CI[0.881,0.909]),而ISS的ROC曲线下面积为0.792(95%CI[0.773,0.811])。这种差异无统计学意义(z = 3.236,P = 0.001)。当TI评分≥16分且ISS值≥22分时,能最好地识别AT住院患者潜在的危急病情。

结论

与ISS值相比,创伤指数评分在预测AT住院患者预后方面具有更高的分辨率。该量表实施简单、可靠、易于学习,能快速识别病情,对危重伤员的早期发现和治疗至关重要。

相似文献

5
[Application value of thromboelastography in patients with multiple trauma in emergency department].[血栓弹力图在急诊科多发伤患者中的应用价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 May;31(5):623-628. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.05.020.
7
Trauma indices for prediction of acute respiratory distress syndrome.预测急性呼吸窘迫综合征的创伤指数
J Surg Res. 2016 Apr;201(2):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.11.050. Epub 2015 Nov 30.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of the Injury Severity Score and the Trauma Mortality Prediction Model.损伤严重度评分与创伤死亡率预测模型的比较。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jan;76(1):47-52; discussion 52-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab0d5d.
8
A genomic score prognostic of outcome in trauma patients.一种预测创伤患者预后的基因组评分。
Mol Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;15(7-8):220-7. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2009.00027. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
9
A laboratory-based risk score for medical intensive care patients.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46(6):855-62. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2008.136.
10
AIS 2005: a contemporary injury scale.《2005年简明损伤定级标准》:一种现代损伤分级标准
Injury. 2006 Dec;37(12):1083-91. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.07.009. Epub 2006 Nov 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验