Rosenthal A, Luthi J, Belohlavek M, Kortüm K M, Mookadam F, Mayo A, Fonseca R, Bergsagel P L, Reeder C B, Mikhael J R, Stewart A K
Division of Hematology Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Blood Cancer J. 2016 Jan 15;6(1):e384. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2015.112.
Carfilzomib (Cfz) has been associated with an ~5% incidence of unexplained and unpredictable cardiovascular toxicity in clinical trials. We therefore implemented a detailed, prospective, clinical cardiac and renal evaluation of 62 Cfz-treated myeloma patients, including serial blood pressure (BP), creatinine, troponin, NT-proBNP and pre- and post-treatment echocardiograms, including ejection fraction (EF), average global longitudinal strain and compliance. Pre-treatment elevations in NT-proBNP and BP, as well as abnormal cardiac strain were common. A rise in NT-proBNP occurred frequently post-treatment often without corresponding cardiopulmonary symptoms. A rise in creatinine was common, lessened with hydration and often reversible. All patients had a normal EF pre-treatment. Five patients experienced a significant cardiac event (four decline in EF and one myocardial infarction), of which 2 (3.2%) were considered probably attributable to Cfz. None were rechallenged with Cfz. The ideal strategy for identifying patients at risk for cardiac events, and parameters by which to monitor for early toxicity have not been established; however, it appears baseline echocardiographic testing is not consistently predictive of toxicity. The toxicities observed suggest an endothelial mechanism and further clinical trials are needed to determine whether or not this represents a class effect or is Cfz specific.
在临床试验中,卡非佐米(Cfz)与约5%的不明原因且不可预测的心血管毒性发生率相关。因此,我们对62例接受Cfz治疗的骨髓瘤患者进行了详细的、前瞻性的临床心脏和肾脏评估,包括连续测量血压(BP)、肌酐、肌钙蛋白、N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)以及治疗前后的超声心动图,包括射血分数(EF)、平均整体纵向应变和顺应性。治疗前NT-proBNP和BP升高以及心脏应变异常很常见。治疗后NT-proBNP经常升高,且通常没有相应的心肺症状。肌酐升高很常见,通过补液可减轻,且通常是可逆的。所有患者治疗前EF均正常。5例患者发生了严重心脏事件(4例EF下降,1例心肌梗死),其中2例(3.2%)被认为可能归因于Cfz。无人再次接受Cfz治疗。尚未确定识别心脏事件风险患者的理想策略以及监测早期毒性的参数;然而,基线超声心动图检查似乎并不能始终预测毒性。观察到的毒性提示存在内皮机制,需要进一步的临床试验来确定这是类效应还是Cfz特有的效应。