Suppr超能文献

了解美国、欧洲和巴西特发性全身性癫痫的负担:来自国民健康与幸福调查的分析。

Understanding the burden of idiopathic generalized epilepsy in the United States, Europe, and Brazil: An analysis from the National Health and Wellness Survey.

作者信息

Gupta Shaloo, Kwan Patrick, Faught Edward, Tsong Wan, Forsythe Anna, Ryvlin Phillipe

机构信息

Kantar Health, 1 Independence Way, Suite 220, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.

The University of Melbourne and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Feb;55:146-56. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.12.018. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to understand the current burden of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) associated with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) as a function of seizure frequency. We analyzed data for (IGE) as a proxy measure of PGTCS. Little is known about the quality of life (QoL), health utility, productivity, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and cost burden of PGTCS or IGE. Patients were identified from the US (2011, 2012, & 2013), 5EU (2011 & 2013), and Brazil (2011 & 2012) National Health and Wellness Survey, a nationally representative, internet-based survey of adults (18+ years). Patients that self-reported a diagnosis of IGE were categorized into seizure frequencies of: ≥1 seizure per week, 1-3 seizures per month, 1-4 seizures per year, or <1 seizure per year. QoL was measured using the SF-36v2 Mental (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores, health utilities with the SF-6D, productivity with the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire, and HRU as reported in the past six months. Unit costs were estimated from the literature and multiplied against HRU values to calculate direct costs and WPAI values to calculate indirect costs. Generalized linear regression was utilized to examine the relationship between seizure frequency and each measure of burden with adjustment for covariates. Out of the general population surveyed, IGE was self-reported in 782 of 176,093 (US), 172 of 30,000 (UK), 106 of 30,001 (Germany), 87 of 30,000 (France), 31 of 12,011 (Spain), 22 of 17,500 (Italy), and 34 of 24,000 (Brazil). Persistent seizures (≥1 per year) were reported in over 40% of patients with IGE (10-15% with ≥1 seizure per week, 10-15% with 1-3 seizures per month, 20-25% with 1-4 seizures per year). Over 75% were treated with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Compared with those having <1 seizure per year (reference group), patients in the two most frequent seizure categories reported worse MCS and PCS scores. Patients in the three highest seizure frequency groups consistently reported worse health utility scores, and greater presenteeism (attending work while not physically or mentally capable of working), overall work impairment, activity impairment, HRU, indirect costs, and direct costs than the reference group. Despite the availability of AEDs during the year surveyed, a substantial number of patients experienced persistent seizures. Increasing seizure frequency was clearly associated with worse outcomes. The burden of PGTCS and IGE may be proportionally reduced by newer AEDs which may increase the proportion of seizure-free patients or shift more patients into lower seizure frequency categories.

摘要

本研究的目的是了解与特发性全身性癫痫(IGE)相关的原发性全身性强直阵挛发作(PGTCS)当前的负担情况,该负担是发作频率的函数。我们分析了IGE的数据,将其作为PGTCS的替代指标。关于PGTCS或IGE的生活质量(QoL)、健康效用、生产力、医疗资源利用(HRU)以及成本负担,人们了解甚少。患者来自美国(2011年、2012年和2013年)、5个欧盟国家(2011年和2013年)以及巴西(2011年和2012年)的国民健康与幸福调查,这是一项具有全国代表性的针对成年人(18岁及以上)的基于互联网的调查。自我报告诊断为IGE的患者被分为以下发作频率类别:每周≥1次发作、每月1 - 3次发作、每年1 - 4次发作或每年<1次发作。使用SF - 36v2心理(MCS)和身体成分总结(PCS)评分来衡量生活质量,用SF - 6D衡量健康效用,用工作生产力和活动障碍(WPAI)问卷衡量生产力,用过去六个月报告的医疗资源利用情况衡量HRU。从文献中估算单位成本,并将其与HRU值相乘来计算直接成本,将WPAI值相乘来计算间接成本。利用广义线性回归来检验发作频率与各项负担指标之间的关系,并对协变量进行调整。在接受调查的普通人群中,美国176,093人中有782人自我报告患有IGE,英国30,000人中有172人,德国30,001人中有106人,法国30,000人中有87人,西班牙12,011人中有31人,意大利17,500人中有22人,巴西24,000人中有34人。超过40%的IGE患者报告有持续性发作(每年≥1次)(每周≥1次发作的患者占10 - 15%,每月1 - 3次发作的患者占10 - 15%,每年1 - 4次发作的患者占20 - 25%)。超过75%的患者接受了抗癫痫药物(AEDs)治疗。与每年发作<1次的患者(参照组)相比,发作频率最高的两类患者报告的MCS和PCS评分更差。发作频率最高的三个组的患者始终报告健康效用评分更差,且出勤主义(在身体或精神上无能力工作时仍出勤工作)、总体工作障碍、活动障碍、HRU、间接成本和直接成本均高于参照组。尽管在调查年份有AEDs可用,但仍有相当数量的患者经历持续性发作。发作频率增加显然与更差的结果相关。新型AEDs可能会增加无发作患者的比例或使更多患者进入发作频率较低的类别,从而可能按比例减轻PGTCS和IGE的负担。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验