Lopatka Martin, Barcaru Andrei, Sjerps Marjan J, Vivó-Truyols Gabriel
Korteweg-de Vries Institute for Mathematics, University of Amsterdam, Postbus 94248, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Netherlands Forensic Institute, Postbus 24044, 2490 AA Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Van 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Postbus 94248, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Chromatogr A. 2016 Jan 29;1431:122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.12.063. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
Accurate analysis of chromatographic data often requires the removal of baseline drift. A frequently employed strategy strives to determine asymmetric weights in order to fit a baseline model by regression. Unfortunately, chromatograms characterized by a very high peak saturation pose a significant challenge to such algorithms. In addition, a low signal-to-noise ratio (i.e. s/n<40) also adversely affects accurate baseline correction by asymmetrically weighted regression. We present a baseline estimation method that leverages a probabilistic peak detection algorithm. A posterior probability of being affected by a peak is computed for each point in the chromatogram, leading to a set of weights that allow non-iterative calculation of a baseline estimate. For extremely saturated chromatograms, the peak weighted (PW) method demonstrates notable improvement compared to the other methods examined. However, in chromatograms characterized by low-noise and well-resolved peaks, the asymmetric least squares (ALS) and the more sophisticated Mixture Model (MM) approaches achieve superior results in significantly less time. We evaluate the performance of these three baseline correction methods over a range of chromatographic conditions to demonstrate the cases in which each method is most appropriate.
准确分析色谱数据通常需要去除基线漂移。一种常用的策略是努力确定非对称权重,以便通过回归拟合基线模型。不幸的是,具有非常高的峰饱和度特征的色谱图对这类算法构成了重大挑战。此外,低信噪比(即s/n<40)也会通过非对称加权回归对准确的基线校正产生不利影响。我们提出了一种利用概率峰检测算法的基线估计方法。计算色谱图中每个点受峰影响的后验概率,从而得到一组权重,可用于非迭代计算基线估计值。对于极度饱和的色谱图,与其他所研究的方法相比,峰加权(PW)方法显示出显著的改进。然而,在具有低噪声和良好分离峰特征的色谱图中,非对称最小二乘法(ALS)和更复杂的混合模型(MM)方法能在显著更短的时间内取得更好的结果。我们在一系列色谱条件下评估这三种基线校正方法的性能,以证明每种方法最适用的情况。