Maldonado Andrés A, Kircher Michelle F, Spinner Robert J, Bishop Allen T, Shin Alexander Y
Mayo Clinic, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Hand Surgery, 200 1st Street South West, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Mayo Clinic, Department of Neurologic Surgery and Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Hand Surgery, 200 1st Street South West, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Mar;69(3):311-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.10.019. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
Despite undergoing complex brachial plexus, surgical reconstructions, and rehabilitation, some patients request an elective amputation. This study evaluates the role of elective amputation after brachial plexus injury.
A retrospective chart review was performed for all the 2140 patients with brachial plexus injuries treated with elective amputation between 1999 and 2012 at a single institution. Analysis was conducted on the potential predisposing factors for amputation, amputation level, and postamputation complications. Patients were evaluated using pre- and postamputation Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm, and hand scores in addition to visual analog pain scores.
The following three conditions were observed in all nine patients who requested an elective amputation: (1) Pan-plexus injury; (2) non-recovery (mid-humeral amputation) or elbow flexion recovery only (forearm amputation) 1 year after all other surgical options were performed; and (3) at least one chronic complication (chronic infection, nonunion fractures, full-thickness burns, chronic neck pain with arm weight, etc.). Pain improvement was found in five patients. Subjective patient assessments and visual analog pain scores before and after amputation did not show a statistically significant improvement in Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm, and Hand Scores. However, four patients reported that their shoulder pain felt "better" than it did before the amputation, and two patients indicated they were completely cured of chronic pain after surgery.
Elective amputation after brachial plexus injury should be considered as an option in the above circumstances. When the informed and educated decision is made, patients can have satisfactory outcomes regarding amputation.
尽管接受了复杂的臂丛神经手术重建及康复治疗,但仍有部分患者要求进行择期截肢。本研究评估臂丛神经损伤后择期截肢的作用。
对1999年至2012年在单一机构接受择期截肢治疗的2140例臂丛神经损伤患者进行回顾性病历审查。分析截肢的潜在诱发因素、截肢水平及截肢后并发症。除视觉模拟疼痛评分外,还使用截肢前后的肩、臂和手部功能障碍评分对患者进行评估。
在所有9例要求择期截肢的患者中观察到以下三种情况:(1)全丛神经损伤;(2)在所有其他手术选择实施1年后无恢复(肱骨中段截肢)或仅肘部屈曲恢复(前臂截肢);(3)至少有一种慢性并发症(慢性感染、骨折不愈合、全层烧伤、因手臂负重导致的慢性颈部疼痛等)。5例患者疼痛得到改善。截肢前后患者的主观评估及视觉模拟疼痛评分在肩、臂和手部功能障碍评分方面未显示出统计学上的显著改善。然而,4例患者报告其肩部疼痛比截肢前“有所好转”,2例患者表示术后慢性疼痛完全治愈。
在上述情况下,臂丛神经损伤后的择期截肢应被视为一种选择。当患者做出明智且经过充分了解的决定时,截肢可取得令人满意的结果。