Suppr超能文献

社区水氟化的经济评估:社区指南系统评价

Economic Evaluation of Community Water Fluoridation: A Community Guide Systematic Review.

作者信息

Ran Tao, Chattopadhyay Sajal K

机构信息

Community Guide Branch, Division of Public Health Information Dissemination, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.

Community Guide Branch, Division of Public Health Information Dissemination, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jun;50(6):790-796. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.10.014. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

Abstract

CONTEXT

A recently updated Community Guide systematic review of the effectiveness of community water fluoridation once again found evidence that it reduces dental caries. Although community water fluoridation was found to save money in a 2002 Community Guide systematic review, the conclusion was based on studies conducted before 1995. Given the update to the effectiveness review, re-examination of the benefit and cost of community water fluoridation is necessary.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Using methods developed for Community Guide economic reviews, 564 studies were identified within a search period from January 1995 to November 2013. Ten studies were included in the current review, with four covering community fluoridation benefits only and another six providing both cost and benefit information. Additionally, two of the six studies analyzed the cost effectiveness of community water fluoridation. All currencies were converted to 2013 dollars.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The analysis was conducted in 2014. The benefit-only studies used regression analysis, showing that different measures of dental costs were always lower in communities with water fluoridation. For the six cost-benefit studies, per capita annual intervention cost ranged from $0.11 to $4.92 for communities with at least 1,000 population, and per capita annual benefit ranged from $5.49 to $93.19. Benefit-cost ratios ranged from 1.12:1 to 135:1, and these ratios were positively associated with community population size.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent evidence continues to indicate that the economic benefit of community water fluoridation exceeds the intervention cost. Further, the benefit-cost ratio increases with the community population size.

摘要

背景

最近更新的《社区指南》对社区水氟化效果的系统评价再次发现了其减少龋齿的证据。尽管在2002年的《社区指南》系统评价中发现社区水氟化能节省资金,但其结论是基于1995年以前进行的研究。鉴于有效性评价的更新,有必要重新审视社区水氟化的益处和成本。

证据获取

采用为《社区指南》经济评价开发的方法,在1995年1月至2013年11月的检索期内识别出564项研究。本评价纳入了10项研究,其中4项仅涵盖社区氟化的益处,另外6项提供了成本和效益信息。此外,6项研究中的2项分析了社区水氟化的成本效益。所有货币均换算为2013年美元。

证据综合

分析于2014年进行。仅涉及益处的研究采用回归分析,表明在有水氟化的社区,不同衡量方式下的牙科成本总是更低。对于6项成本效益研究,人口至少为1000人的社区人均年度干预成本在0.11美元至4.92美元之间,人均年度效益在5.49美元至93.19美元之间。效益成本比在1.12:1至135:1之间,且这些比率与社区人口规模呈正相关。

结论

近期证据继续表明,社区水氟化的经济效益超过干预成本。此外,效益成本比随社区人口规模增加而提高。

相似文献

1
Economic Evaluation of Community Water Fluoridation: A Community Guide Systematic Review.
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jun;50(6):790-796. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.10.014. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

引用本文的文献

1
Fluoride Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors: Adults in Rural Alabama.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251350921. doi: 10.1177/21501319251350921. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
2
Economic Evaluation of Community Water Fluoridation in an Upper-Middle-Income Country.
Braz Dent J. 2024 Dec 6;35:e245994. doi: 10.1590/0103-644020245994. eCollection 2024.
3
Top 100 most cited economic evaluation papers of preventive oral health programmes: A bibliometric analysis.
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 Nov-Dec;14(6):802-807. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.10.012. Epub 2024 Nov 3.
6
Community Water Fluoridation in Focus: A Comprehensive Look at Fluoridation Levels across America.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 23;20(23):7100. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20237100.
7
Metabolic effect of low fluoride levels in the islets of NOD mice: integrative morphological, immunohistochemical, and proteomic analyses.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2023 Jun 5;31:e20230036. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0036. eCollection 2023.
8
The Impact of Water Fluoridation on Medicaid-Eligible Children and Adolescents in Alaska.
J Prev (2022). 2022 Feb;43(1):111-123. doi: 10.1007/s10935-021-00656-x. Epub 2022 Jan 20.

本文引用的文献

1
National health spending in 2013: growth slows, remains in step with the overall economy.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jan;34(1):150-60. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1107. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
2
The economic value of Quebec's water fluoridation program.
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2013;21(6):523-533. doi: 10.1007/s10389-013-0578-3. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
4
Cost-effectiveness of extending the coverage of water supply fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries in Australia.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012 Aug;40(4):369-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00684.x. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
6
The impact of changing dental needs on cost savings from fluoridation.
Aust Dent J. 2010 Mar;55(1):37-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01173.x.
7
Drinking water fluoridation in South East Queensland: a cost-effectiveness evaluation.
Health Promot J Austr. 2010 Apr;21(1):51-6. doi: 10.1071/he10051.
8
A comparison of dental treatment utilization and costs by HMO members living in fluoridated and nonfluoridated areas.
J Public Health Dent. 2007 Fall;67(4):224-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2007.00033.x.
9
Costs and savings associated with community water fluoridation programs in Colorado.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2005 Nov;2 Spec no(Spec No):A06. Epub 2005 Nov 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验