Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Knee Surgery Division, Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology-Hospital and Clinics, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (IOT\-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Musculoskeletal Radiology Division, Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology-Hospital and Clinics, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (IOT\-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2015 Dec 16;3(12):2325967115621024. doi: 10.1177/2325967115621024. eCollection 2015 Dec.
Anatomic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have recently characterized the knee anterolateral ligament (ALL). So far, no study has focused on confirming whether the evaluated MRI parameters truly correspond with ALL anatomy.
To assess the validity of MRI in detecting the ALL using an anatomic evaluation as reference.
Descriptive laboratory study.
A total of 13 cadaveric knees were subjected to MRI and then to anatomic dissection. Dissection was performed according to previous anatomic study methodology. MRIs were performed with a 0.6- to 1.5-mm slice thickness and prior saline injection. The following variables were analyzed: distance from the origin of the ALL to the origin of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), distance from the origin of the ALL to its bifurcation point, maximum length of the ALL, distance from the tibial insertion of the ALL to the articular surface of the tibia, ALL thickness, and ALL width. The 2 sets of measurements were analyzed using the Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) and Bland-Altman plots.
The ALL was clearly observed in all dissected knees and MRI scans. It originated anterior and distal to the LCL, close to the lateral epycondile center, and showed an anteroinferior path toward the tibia, inserting between the Gerdy tubercle and the fibular head, around 5 mm under the lateral plateau. The ρ values tended to increase together for all studied variables between the 2 methods, and all were statistically significant, except for thickness (P = .077). Bland-Altman plots showed a tendency toward a reduction of ALL thickness and width by MRI compared with anatomic dissection.
MRI scanning as described can accurately assess the ALL and demonstrates characteristics similar to those seen under anatomic dissection.
MRI can accurately characterize the ALL in the anterolateral region of the knee, despite the presence of structures that might overlap and thus cause confusion when making assessments based on imaging methods.
最近的解剖学和磁共振成像(MRI)研究已经对膝关节前外侧韧带(ALL)进行了描述。到目前为止,尚无研究专注于证实评估的 MRI 参数是否与 ALL 解剖结构真正对应。
使用解剖评估作为参考来评估 MRI 在检测 ALL 中的有效性。
描述性实验室研究。
对 13 个尸体膝关节进行 MRI 检查,然后进行解剖学检查。解剖学检查按照先前的解剖学研究方法进行。MRI 检查采用 0.6-1.5mm 层厚和盐水注射前进行。分析了以下变量:ALL 起点到外侧副韧带(LCL)起点的距离、ALL 起点到分叉点的距离、ALL 的最大长度、ALL 胫骨插入点到胫骨关节面的距离、ALL 厚度和 ALL 宽度。使用 Spearman 相关系数(ρ)和 Bland-Altman 图分析两组测量值。
所有解剖膝关节和 MRI 扫描中均清楚地观察到 ALL。它起源于 LCL 的前侧和远端,靠近外侧髁中心,呈前下向胫骨方向走行,插入 Gerdy 结节和腓骨头之间,位于外侧平台下方约 5mm 处。两种方法之间,所有研究变量的 ρ 值均呈增加趋势,除厚度外(P=0.077),均具有统计学意义。Bland-Altman 图显示,与解剖学检查相比,MRI 扫描中 ALL 的厚度和宽度呈减小趋势。
如本文所述,MRI 扫描可准确评估 ALL,并显示与解剖学检查相似的特征。
尽管存在可能重叠的结构,导致基于影像学方法进行评估时出现混淆,但 MRI 可准确描述膝关节前外侧区域的 ALL。