• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机自适应测试(CAT)中项目参数漂移的影响。

The Impact of Item Parameter Drift in Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT).

作者信息

Risk Nicole

机构信息

Nicole Risk, American Medical Technologists, 10700 W. Higgins Road, Suite 150, Rosemont, IL 60018, USA,

出版信息

J Appl Meas. 2016;17(1):54-78.

PMID:26784378
Abstract

This study looked at numerous aspects of item parameter drift (IPD) and its impact on measurement in computer adaptive testing (CAT). A series of CAT simulations were conducted, varying the amount and magnitude of IPD, as well as the size of the item pool. The effects of IPD on measurement precision, classification, and test efficiency, were evaluated using a number of criteria. These included bias, root mean square error (RMSE), absolute average difference (AAD), total percentages of misclassifcation, the number of false positives and false negatives, the total test lengths, and item exposure rates. The results revealed negligible differences when comparing the IPD conditions to the baseline condition for all measures of precision, classification accuracy, and test efficiency. The most relevant finding indicates that magnitude of drift has a larger impact on measurement precision than the number of items with drift.

摘要

本研究考察了项目参数漂移(IPD)的诸多方面及其对计算机自适应测试(CAT)中测量的影响。进行了一系列CAT模拟,改变IPD的数量和幅度以及项目库的大小。使用多种标准评估IPD对测量精度、分类和测试效率的影响。这些标准包括偏差、均方根误差(RMSE)、绝对平均差(AAD)、错误分类的总百分比、假阳性和假阴性的数量、总测试长度以及项目曝光率。结果显示,将IPD条件与基线条件相比,在所有精度、分类准确性和测试效率的测量指标上差异可忽略不计。最相关的发现表明,漂移的幅度对测量精度的影响比有漂移的项目数量更大。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Item Parameter Drift in Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT).计算机自适应测试(CAT)中项目参数漂移的影响。
J Appl Meas. 2016;17(1):54-78.
2
The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations.项目池限制对基于拉施模型的计算机自适应测试中能力测量精度的影响:与传统固定长度考试的比较
J Outcome Meas. 1998;2(2):97-122.
3
Adaptive testing for psychological assessment: how many items are enough to run an adaptive testing algorithm?心理评估的自适应测试:运行自适应测试算法需要多少个项目?
J Appl Meas. 2013;14(2):106-17.
4
An experimental study using Rasch analysis to compare absolute magnitude estimation and categorical rating scaling as applied in survey research.一项使用拉施分析比较绝对量值估计和分类评级量表在调查研究中的应用的实验研究。
J Appl Meas. 2013;14(3):262-81.
5
Rasch modeling of accuracy and confidence measures from cognitive tests.认知测试中准确性和置信度测量的拉施模型
J Appl Meas. 2013;14(3):232-48.
6
On initial item selection in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing.关于认知诊断计算机化自适应测试中的初始项目选择
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2016 Nov;69(3):291-315. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12072.
7
Developing new online calibration methods for multidimensional computerized adaptive testing.开发用于多维计算机自适应测试的新型在线校准方法。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2017 Feb;70(1):81-117. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12083.
8
Computerized adaptive testing: the capitalization on chance problem.计算机化自适应测验:机遇利用问题。
Span J Psychol. 2012 Mar;15(1):424-41. doi: 10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n1.37348.
9
Exploring the Utility of Logistic Mixed Modeling Approaches to Simultaneously Investigate Item and Testlet DIF on Testlet-based Data.探索逻辑混合建模方法在基于测验项目组数据同时研究项目和测验项目组差异项目功能(DIF)方面的效用。
J Appl Meas. 2016;17(1):79-90.
10
Does Instruction Affect the Underlying Dimensionality of a Kinesiology Test?指导会影响运动机能学测试的潜在维度吗?
J Appl Meas. 2016;17(4):393-415.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptive Measurement of Change in the Context of Item Parameter Drift.项目参数漂移背景下变化的自适应测量
Appl Psychol Meas. 2024 Dec 30:01466216241310599. doi: 10.1177/01466216241310599.