Shaik Muhammad Amin, Chan Qun Lin, Xu Jing, Xu Xin, Hui Richard Jor Yeong, Chong Steven Shih Tsze, Chen Christopher Li-Hsian, Dong YanHong
Department of Pharmacology, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Memory Aging and Cognition Centre, National University Health System, Singapore.
NHG Polyclinics, National Healthcare Group, Singapore.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Apr 1;17(4):343-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.12.007. Epub 2016 Jan 16.
Case finding for cognitive impairment (CI) is recommended for all persons older than 70 years.
The present study identified additional risk factors of CI so as to operationalize a composite total risk score (TRS) for case finding. We then examined the additive effect of the TRS and brief cognitive tests to improve the diagnosis of CI.
The study was conducted in 2 primary health care centers in Singapore. A total of 1082 individuals (≥60 years old) were assessed for sociodemographic risk factors and their informants were administered the AD8; 309 individuals who agreed for further cognitive assessments completed the Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and a neuropsychological battery at a research center. Primary health care medical records were accessed for data on vascular risk factors.
Of the 309 individuals who underwent neuropsychological evaluation, 4 were excluded due to missing medical data; 167 (54.8%) individuals had CI and 138 (45.2%) had No Cognitive Impairment (NCI). The β coefficients were standardized to calculate risk scores. CI was significantly predicted by age >70 years (odds ratio [OR] 5.99; score = 3), diabetes (OR 3.36; score = 2), stroke (OR 2.70; score = 1), female gender (OR 2.02; score = 1) and individual cognitive complaints (SCC) (OR 1.95; score = 1). The TRS had an optimal cutoff of ≥3 and explained considerable variance in global cognitive composite Z-scores (R(2) = 0.41, P < .001). The MoCA explained substantial variance compared with the MMSE and AD8 (R(2) changes of 0.474, 0.422, and 0.157, P < .001, respectively).
The TRS is a reasonable measure to predict individuals at risk of CI. The addition of the MoCA, in persons with positive TRS scores, is a useful approach to improve the diagnosis of CI for at-risk patients attending primary health care.
建议对所有70岁以上的人群进行认知障碍(CI)筛查。
本研究确定了CI的其他风险因素,以便制定用于筛查的综合总风险评分(TRS)。然后,我们研究了TRS和简短认知测试的累加效应,以改善CI的诊断。
该研究在新加坡的2个初级卫生保健中心进行。共评估了1082名年龄≥60岁的个体的社会人口学风险因素,并对其 informant 进行了AD8测试;309名同意进一步进行认知评估的个体在研究中心完成了简易精神状态检查(MMSE)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)以及一套神经心理测试。查阅初级卫生保健医疗记录以获取血管危险因素的数据。
在接受神经心理评估的309名个体中,4名因缺少医疗数据而被排除;167名(54.8%)个体患有CI,138名(45.2%)个体无认知障碍(NCI)。对β系数进行标准化以计算风险评分。年龄>70岁(比值比[OR]5.99;评分=3)、糖尿病(OR 3.36;评分=2)、中风(OR 2.70;评分=1)、女性(OR 2.02;评分=1)和个体认知主诉(SCC)(OR 1.95;评分=1)可显著预测CI。TRS的最佳截断值为≥3,并且在总体认知综合Z评分中解释了相当大的方差(R(2)=0.41,P<.001)。与MMSE和AD8相比,MoCA解释了更大的方差(R(2)变化分别为0.474、0.422和0.157,P<.001)。
TRS是预测有CI风险个体的合理指标。对于TRS评分呈阳性的个体,增加MoCA是改善初级卫生保健中高危患者CI诊断的有用方法。