Koncar Igor, Ribac Jelena Z, Ilic Nikola S, Dragas Marko, Mutavdzic Perica, Tomic Ivan Z, Ristanovic Natasa, Kostic Dusan, Davidovic Lazar
Faculty of Medical, University of Belgrade, Serbia
Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Vascular. 2016 Dec;24(6):580-589. doi: 10.1177/1708538115627576. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
In case of highly atherosclerotic carotid process, carotid graft replacement might be a potential solution for successful procedure. Many studies evaluated the results of vein and polytetrafluorethilen (PTFE) graft usage at the carotid bifurcation, while the experience on the Dacron graft due to extensive atherosclerotic process is missing. The aim of our study was to evaluate 30-day and long-term results of the Dacron graft on carotid artery used in patients with extensive atherosclerotic disease.
This retrospective study analysed early and long-term neurological outcome as well as Dacron graft patency in patients operated with carotid reconstruction. Early results were confirmed by follow-up clinical examination, whereas late results were assessed by follow-up clinical examination as well as duplex sonographic examination at least 1 year after the surgery. As for statistical methods we used descriptive analysis tests, Chi-square test, and logistic regression.
Carotid graft replacement was performed in 292 patients, before endarterectomy in 155 (53.09%), or after already attempted unsuccessful eversion endarterectomy in 137 (46.91%). Nineteen (6.5%) patients had a stroke due to ipsilateral and contralateral ischaemia or haemorrhagic in 17 (5.8%), 1 (0.3%) and 1 (0.3%) patients, respectively. Significantly higher rate of strokes occurred when the graft reconstruction was used after the failure of endarterectomy (8.5% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.029). Stroke and death rate was 7.19%. Factors that increased risk of early stroke were the length of plaque in the internal carotid artery measured intraoperatively (p = 0.025) and the surgical tactic to perform graft reconstruction after attempted extensive endarterectomy (p = 0.029).
Low number of patients with carotid stenosis has extensive atherosclerotic process longer than 4 cm that might jeopardise eversion endarterectomy. Carotid graft replacement with Dacron graft provide early results that are comparable with other conduits; however, in such patients reconstruction should be selected individually based on surgical experience and anatomical distribution of stenotic disease. Due to high risk of stroke, only symptomatic patients with such extensive atherosclerotic disease should be operated.
对于高度动脉粥样硬化的颈动脉病变,颈动脉移植置换术可能是成功手术的一种潜在解决方案。许多研究评估了在颈动脉分叉处使用静脉和聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)移植物的结果,而对于因广泛动脉粥样硬化病变使用涤纶移植物的经验尚缺。我们研究的目的是评估涤纶移植物用于患有广泛动脉粥样硬化疾病患者的颈动脉时的30天和长期结果。
这项回顾性研究分析了接受颈动脉重建手术患者的早期和长期神经学结果以及涤纶移植物的通畅情况。早期结果通过随访临床检查得以证实,而晚期结果通过随访临床检查以及术后至少1年的双功超声检查进行评估。至于统计方法,我们使用了描述性分析测试、卡方检验和逻辑回归。
292例患者接受了颈动脉移植置换术,其中155例(53.09%)在动脉内膜切除术之前进行,137例(46.91%)在尝试外翻动脉内膜切除术失败后进行。19例(6.5%)患者发生了中风,其中17例(5.8%)因同侧和对侧缺血性中风,1例(0.3%)因出血性中风,1例(0.3%)情况未明确说明。当在动脉内膜切除术失败后使用移植物重建时,中风发生率显著更高(8.5%对3.5%,p = 0.029)。中风和死亡率为7.19%。增加早期中风风险的因素包括术中测量的颈内动脉斑块长度(p = 0.025)以及在尝试广泛动脉内膜切除术后进行移植物重建的手术策略(p = 0.029)。
患有颈动脉狭窄且动脉粥样硬化病变广泛超过4厘米可能危及外翻动脉内膜切除术的患者数量较少。用涤纶移植物进行颈动脉移植置换术的早期结果与其他导管相当;然而,对于此类患者,应根据手术经验和狭窄疾病的解剖分布进行个体化选择重建方式。由于中风风险高,仅应对有症状的此类广泛动脉粥样硬化疾病患者进行手术。