• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

等效结构方程模型与组相等约束

Equivalent Structural Equation Models and Group Equality Constraints.

作者信息

Raykov T

出版信息

Multivariate Behav Res. 1997 Apr 1;32(2):95-104. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_1.

DOI:10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_1
PMID:26788754
Abstract

This article is concerned with equivalent structural equation models that have been extended to multigroup models. It is shown that imposing cross-group equality constraints upon (a) no parameters or all parameters, or (b) any number of parameters in which the models are identical, preserves the model equivalence property. Alternatively, constraining for equality across groups some of those parameters in which the models differ can yield nonequivalent multiple-group models. The results are illustrated on two-group cognitive intervention data.

摘要

本文关注的是已扩展到多组模型的等效结构方程模型。结果表明,对(a)无参数或所有参数,或(b)模型相同的任意数量参数施加跨组相等约束,可保持模型等效性。另外,对模型不同的部分参数进行跨组相等约束会产生非等效的多组模型。这些结果在两组认知干预数据上得到了说明。

相似文献

1
Equivalent Structural Equation Models and Group Equality Constraints.等效结构方程模型与组相等约束
Multivariate Behav Res. 1997 Apr 1;32(2):95-104. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_1.
2
How the 2SLS/IV estimator can handle equality constraints in structural equation models: a system-of-equations approach.两阶段最小二乘法/工具变量估计器如何处理结构方程模型中的等式约束:一种方程组方法。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2014 May;67(2):353-69. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12023. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
3
Comparing standardized coefficients in structural equation modeling: a model reparameterization approach.结构方程建模中标准化系数的比较:模型重参数化方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Sep;43(3):730-45. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0088-6.
4
On Structural Equation Model Equivalence.论结构方程模型等价性。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1999 Apr 1;34(2):199-244. doi: 10.1207/S15327906Mb340204.
5
Estimating, testing, and comparing specific effects in structural equation models: the phantom model approach.结构方程模型中特定效应的估计、检验和比较:幻影模型方法。
Psychol Methods. 2011 Mar;16(1):34-43. doi: 10.1037/a0021763.
6
On the likelihood ratio test in structural equation modeling when parameters are subject to boundary constraints.关于结构方程模型中参数受边界约束时的似然比检验
Psychol Methods. 2006 Dec;11(4):439-55. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.4.439.
7
Control of Type I Errors with Multiple Tests of Constraints in Structural Equation Modeling.结构方程模型中多重约束检验下的I型错误控制
Multivariate Behav Res. 1997 Jan 1;32(1):39-51. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_2.
8
The Specific Analysis of Structural Equation Models.结构方程模型的具体分析
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Oct 1;39(4):687-713. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3904_5.
9
Multigroup Comparisons and the Assumption of Equivalent Construct Validity Across Groups: Methodological and Substantive Issues.多组比较和跨组等效结构效度假设:方法学与实质性问题
Multivariate Behav Res. 1989 Oct 1;24(4):503-23. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2404_7.
10
Addressing Quantitative and Qualitative Hypotheses Using Regression Models with Equality Restrictions and Predictors Measured in Common Units.使用具有平等约束和共同单位测量的回归模型解决定量和定性假设。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2021 Jan-Feb;56(1):86-100. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2020.1754154. Epub 2020 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
A prospective examination of the role of childhood sexual abuse and physiological asymmetry in the development of psychopathology.前瞻性研究儿童期性虐待和生理不对称在精神病理学发展中的作用。
Child Abuse Negl. 2010 Oct;34(10):752-61. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.02.010. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
2
Neighborhoods, Family, and Substance Use: Comparisons of the Relations across Racial and Ethnic Groups.社区、家庭与物质使用:不同种族和族裔群体间关系的比较
Soc Serv Rev. 2006 Dec;80(4):675-704. doi: 10.1086/508380.
3
A prospective investigation of the impact of childhood sexual abuse on the development of sexuality.
一项关于儿童期性虐待对性发育影响的前瞻性调查。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Jun;71(3):575-86. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.71.3.575.