McLawhorn Alexander S, Southren Daniel, Wang Y Claire, Marx Robert G, Dodwell Emily R
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021. E-mail address for A.S. McLawhorn:
Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jan 20;98(2):e6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00416.
Obesity is associated with adverse outcomes and increased costs after total knee arthroplasty. Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for morbid obesity, but its cost-effectiveness for weight loss prior to total knee arthroplasty is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery prior to total knee arthroplasty for patients in whom medical treatment of obesity and knee osteoarthritis had failed.
A state-transition Markov model was constructed to compare the cost-utility of two treatment protocols for patients with morbid obesity and end-stage knee osteoarthritis: (1) immediate total knee arthroplasty and (2) bariatric surgery two years prior to the total knee arthroplasty. The probability of transition for each health state and its utility were derived from the literature. Costs, expressed in 2012 United States dollars, were estimated with use of administrative and claims data. Costs and utilities were discounted at 3% annually, and effectiveness was expressed in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The principal outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed, using $100,000 per QALY as the threshold willingness to pay.
Morbidly obese patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty alone had lower QALYs gained than patients who underwent bariatric surgery two years prior to the total knee arthroplasty. The ICER between these two procedures was approximately $13,910 per QALY, well below the threshold willingness to pay. Results were stable across broad value ranges for independent variables. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis found that the median ICER was $14,023 per QALY (95% confidence interval, $4875 to $51,210 per QALY).
This model supports bariatric surgery prior to total knee arthroplasty as a cost-effective option for improving outcomes in morbidly obese patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis who are indicated for total knee arthroplasty.
Economic and Decision Analysis Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
肥胖与全膝关节置换术后的不良后果及成本增加相关。减肥手术是治疗病态肥胖的有效方法,但其在全膝关节置换术前减肥的成本效益尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估减肥手术对于肥胖及膝骨关节炎内科治疗失败的患者在全膝关节置换术前的成本效益。
构建一个状态转换马尔可夫模型,以比较两种治疗方案对于病态肥胖和终末期膝骨关节炎患者的成本效用:(1)立即进行全膝关节置换术;(2)在全膝关节置换术前两年进行减肥手术。每个健康状态的转换概率及其效用均来自文献。成本以2012年美元表示,使用行政和理赔数据进行估算。成本和效用按每年3%进行贴现,效果以质量调整生命年(QALY)表示。主要结局指标为增量成本效益比(ICER)。进行了单向、双向和概率敏感性分析,将每QALY 100,000美元作为支付意愿阈值。
单纯接受全膝关节置换术的病态肥胖患者获得的QALY低于在全膝关节置换术前两年接受减肥手术的患者。这两种手术之间的ICER约为每QALY 13,910美元,远低于支付意愿阈值。在自变量的广泛取值范围内结果稳定。概率敏感性分析发现,ICER中位数为每QALY 14,023美元(95%置信区间为每QALY 4875美元至51,210美元)。
该模型支持对于有全膝关节置换术指征的终末期膝骨关节炎病态肥胖患者,在全膝关节置换术前进行减肥手术是一种改善结局的成本效益选择。
经济与决策分析II级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者须知。