Ruthig Joelle C, Gamblin Bradlee W, Jones Kelly, Vanderzanden Karen, Kehn Andre
University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA.
Br J Psychol. 2017 Feb;108(1):107-126. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12180. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
Researchers have spent considerable effort examining unrealistic absolute optimism and unrealistic comparative optimism, yet there is a lack of research exploring them concurrently. This longitudinal study repeatedly assessed unrealistic absolute and comparative optimism within a performance context over several months to identify the degree to which they shift as a function of proximity to performance and performance feedback, their associations with global individual difference and event-specific factors, and their link to subsequent behavioural outcomes. Results showed similar shifts in unrealistic absolute and comparative optimism based on proximity to performance and performance feedback. Moreover, increases in both types of unrealistic optimism were associated with better subsequent performance beyond the effect of prior performance. However, several differences were found between the two forms of unrealistic optimism in their associations with global individual difference factors and event-specific factors, highlighting the distinctiveness of the two constructs.
研究人员已花费大量精力研究不切实际的绝对乐观主义和不切实际的比较乐观主义,但缺乏对它们进行同时探讨的研究。这项纵向研究在几个月的时间里,在一个绩效背景下反复评估不切实际的绝对乐观主义和比较乐观主义,以确定它们随接近绩效和绩效反馈的程度而变化的情况、它们与整体个体差异和特定事件因素的关联,以及它们与后续行为结果的联系。结果表明,基于接近绩效和绩效反馈,不切实际的绝对乐观主义和比较乐观主义有类似的变化。此外,两种不切实际的乐观主义的增加都与超出先前绩效影响的更好的后续绩效相关。然而,在两种不切实际的乐观主义与整体个体差异因素和特定事件因素的关联方面发现了一些差异,突出了这两种结构的独特性。