• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据临床科室对他汀类药物处方模式及治疗结果进行分析与比较。

Analysis and comparison of statin prescription patterns and outcomes according to clinical department.

作者信息

Kim H-S, Kim H, Lee H, Park B, Park S, Lee S-H, Cho J H, Song H, Kim J H, Yoon K-H, Choi I Y

机构信息

Department of Medical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Feb;41(1):70-7. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12350. Epub 2016 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1111/jcpt.12350
PMID:26791968
Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

There is a disparity between the Korean treatment guidelines and actual clinical prescription habits. This study was designed to evaluate the department-specific disparities and achievement rates for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets, based on each department's specific statin prescription patterns.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated data from 31 718 patients who had been prescribed a statin at least once between January 2008 and June 2013 at our institution. Patients were classified into the high-risk (target LDL-C < 100 mg/dL) or moderate-risk (target LDL-C < 130 mg/dL) groups, according to the National Cholesterol Education Programme-Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Statins were most commonly prescribed in the cardiology (32·0%) and endocrinology (26·6%) departments. For the high-risk group, 70% of patients in the cardiology, endocrinology and cardiac surgery departments achieved their target LDL-C levels (<100 mg/dL). However, the target achievement rates in most other departments were <70%. For the moderate-risk group, 79·2% of patients achieved their target levels. Departments that prescribed a greater number of high- or intermediate-potency statins were more likely to achieve their target LDL-C levels. The group that achieved their target LDL-C levels (<100 mg/dL) exhibited a significant positive relationship (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0·8571, P = 0·0065), from low to high potency.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Some departments tend to undertreat when prescribing statins. However, to reach to the target LDL-C levels, physicians must overcome their tendency to undertreat with statins. We believe that the target achievement rate will increase if doctors are more actively aware of a patient's individual status and related risk factors before prescribing statins.

摘要

已知信息与研究目的

韩国的治疗指南与实际临床处方习惯之间存在差异。本研究旨在根据各科室特定的他汀类药物处方模式,评估科室特异性差异以及低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)目标的达成率。

方法

我们回顾性评估了2008年1月至2013年6月期间在我院至少接受过一次他汀类药物处方的31718例患者的数据。根据美国国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗小组第三次指南,将患者分为高危组(目标LDL-C<100mg/dL)或中危组(目标LDL-C<130mg/dL)。

结果与讨论

他汀类药物最常用于心内科(32.0%)和内分泌科(26.6%)。对于高危组,心内科、内分泌科和心脏外科的70%患者达到了目标LDL-C水平(<100mg/dL)。然而,大多数其他科室的目标达成率<70%。对于中危组,79.2%的患者达到了目标水平。开具更多高剂量或中等剂量他汀类药物的科室更有可能达到目标LDL-C水平。达到目标LDL-C水平(<100mg/dL)的组从低到高剂量呈现出显著的正相关关系(斯皮尔曼相关系数=0.8571,P=0.0065)。

新发现与结论

一些科室在开具他汀类药物时往往治疗不足。然而,为了达到目标LDL-C水平,医生必须克服他汀类药物治疗不足的倾向。我们认为,如果医生在开具他汀类药物之前更积极地了解患者的个体状况和相关危险因素,目标达成率将会提高。

相似文献

1
Analysis and comparison of statin prescription patterns and outcomes according to clinical department.根据临床科室对他汀类药物处方模式及治疗结果进行分析与比较。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Feb;41(1):70-7. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12350. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
2
Impact of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidelines on the prescription of high-intensity statins in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome or stroke.2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会胆固醇指南对因急性冠状动脉综合征或中风住院患者高强度他汀类药物处方的影响。
Am Heart J. 2016 Nov;181:130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.07.024. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
3
Differences in statin usage and target-goal achievement between departments at the same hospital.同一医院不同科室之间他汀类药物使用和目标达成的差异。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050466. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
4
Analysis and comparison of the cost-effectiveness of statins according to the baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level in Korea.根据韩国的基线低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平对他汀类药物的成本效益进行分析和比较。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017 Jun;42(3):292-300. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12512. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
5
AMG 145, a monoclonal antibody against PCSK9, facilitates achievement of national cholesterol education program-adult treatment panel III low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals among high-risk patients: an analysis from the LAPLACE-TIMI 57 trial (LDL-C assessment with PCSK9 monoclonal antibody inhibition combined with statin thErapy-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 57).AMG 145,一种针对 PCSK9 的单克隆抗体,可帮助高危患者实现国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗专家组 III 低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标:来自 LAPLACE-TIMI 57 试验的分析(使用 PCSK9 单克隆抗体抑制联合他汀类药物治疗进行 LDL-C 评估 - 心肌梗死溶栓治疗 57)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 11;63(5):430-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.048. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
6
Use of Moderate-Intensity Statins for Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level above 190 mg/dL at Baseline in Koreans.韩国人基线低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平高于190mg/dL时使用中等强度他汀类药物的情况。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 Oct;121(4):272-278. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12765. Epub 2017 Jul 9.
7
Titration patterns with rosuvastatin as compared with other statins in clinical practice: a retrospective observational cohort study using an electronic medical record database.临床实践中瑞舒伐他汀与其他他汀类药物的滴定模式:一项使用电子病历数据库的回顾性观察队列研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2385-94. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.010.
8
Treatment patterns and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment among patients receiving high- or moderate-intensity statins.接受高强度或中强度他汀类药物治疗的患者的治疗模式和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)达标情况。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 May;107(5):380-388. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1193-z. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
9
Therapeutic practice patterns related to statin potency and ezetimibe/simvastatin combination therapies in lowering LDL-C in patients with high-risk cardiovascular disease.与他汀类药物效力以及依折麦布/辛伐他汀联合疗法相关的治疗实践模式对高危心血管疾病患者低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的降低作用
J Clin Lipidol. 2014 Jan-Feb;8(1):107-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
10
Dyslipidemias and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor prescription in heart transplant recipients.心脏移植受者的血脂异常与HMG-CoA还原酶抑制剂处方
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Jul-Aug;38(7-8):1136-41. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D535. Epub 2004 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Data Pseudonymization in a Range That Does Not Affect Data Quality: Correlation with the Degree of Participation of Clinicians.数据在不影响数据质量的范围内进行伪匿名化:与临床医生参与程度的相关性。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Nov 15;36(44):e299. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e299.
2
Achievement of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal among patients with dyslipidemia in South Korea.韩国血脂异常患者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标达标情况。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):e0228472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228472. eCollection 2020.
3
Developing a multi-center clinical data mart of ACEI and ARB for real-world evidence (RWE).
开发一个用于真实世界证据(RWE)的ACEI和ARB多中心临床数据集市。
Clin Hypertens. 2018 Dec 15;24:18. doi: 10.1186/s40885-018-0103-7. eCollection 2018.
4
Real-world Evidence versus Randomized Controlled Trial: Clinical Research Based on Electronic Medical Records.真实世界证据与随机对照试验:基于电子病历的临床研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Jun 26;33(34):e213. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e213. eCollection 2018 Aug 20.
5
Phenotyping of Korean patients with better-than-expected efficacy of moderate-intensity statins using tensor factorization.使用张量分解对他汀类药物中等强度治疗效果优于预期的韩国患者进行表型分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 13;13(6):e0197518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197518. eCollection 2018.
6
Pilot Algorithm Designed to Help Early Detection of HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor-Induced Hepatotoxicity.旨在帮助早期检测HMG辅酶A还原酶抑制剂诱导的肝毒性的试验性算法。
Healthc Inform Res. 2017 Jul;23(3):199-207. doi: 10.4258/hir.2017.23.3.199. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
7
Development of Clinical Data Mart of HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor for Varied Clinical Research.用于各类临床研究的HMG-CoA还原酶抑制剂临床数据集市的开发。
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2017 Mar;32(1):90-98. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2017.32.1.90. Epub 2017 Feb 28.