Tang Chunli, Luo Weizhan, Zhong Changhao, Tong Da, Chen Yu, Chen Xiaobo, Li Shiyue
State Key Lab of Respiratory Disease (the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University), National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2016 Jan;39(1):38-40. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2016.01.011.
To evaluate the diagnostic utility of endobronchial ultrasound combined with virtual bronchoscopic navigation guided transbronchial lung biopsy for solitary pulmonary nodules.
A total of 105 patients with suspected peripheral pulmonary lesions who underwent transbronchial lung biopsy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between January and December 2013 were prospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into a conventional group, an endobronchial ultrasound group(EBUS group)and a virtual bronchoscopic navigation combined with endobronchial ultrasound(VB+ EBUS) group. The diagnostic yield and operation time were compared.
The lesion size of the conventional group, the EBUS group and the EBUS+ VB group were (23±8), (20±8)and(18±7)mm, respectively, and there was no significant difference in diagnostic yields by the lesion size (F=0.52, P=0.60). The EBUS+ VB group had the highest diagnostic yield(22 of 29, 76%), which was higher than that of the conventional group(17 of 36, 47%, χ(2)=7.47, P=0.024), but not that of the EBUS group(29 of 40, 72%, χ(2)=0.10, P=0.75). The EBUS group and the EBUS+ VB group did not differ in lesion location by pulmonary segments or histologic findings. The procedure time was significantly longer in the EBUS group than the EBUS+ VB group [(365±221)s verses (256±205)s, t=2.08, P=0.042].
EBUS guided TBLB improves the diagnostic yield in solitary pulmonary lesions, but it should be combined with virtual bronchoscopic navigation for the optimal yield.
评估支气管内超声联合虚拟支气管镜导航引导下经支气管肺活检对孤立性肺结节的诊断效用。
前瞻性评估2013年1月至12月在广州医科大学附属第一医院接受经支气管肺活检的105例疑似周围性肺病变患者。将患者分为常规组、支气管内超声组(EBUS组)和虚拟支气管镜导航联合支气管内超声(VB+EBUS)组。比较诊断率和手术时间。
常规组、EBUS组和EBUS+VB组的病变大小分别为(23±8)、(20±8)和(18±7)mm,不同病变大小的诊断率差异无统计学意义(F=0.52,P=0.60)。EBUS+VB组诊断率最高(29例中的22例,76%),高于常规组(36例中的17例,47%,χ(2)=7.47,P=0.024),但与EBUS组(40例中的29例,72%,χ(2)=0.10,P=0.75)相比无差异。EBUS组和EBUS+VB组在肺段病变位置或组织学结果方面无差异。EBUS组的操作时间明显长于EBUS+VB组[(365±221)秒对(256±205)秒,t=2.08,P=0.042]。
EBUS引导的TBLB提高了孤立性肺病变的诊断率,但为获得最佳诊断率应与虚拟支气管镜导航联合使用。