Narici Marco, Franchi Martino, Maganaris Constantinos
University of Nottingham, Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, MRC-ARUK Centre of Excellence for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, Derby Royal Hospital, Derby DE22 3DT, UK
University of Nottingham, Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, MRC-ARUK Centre of Excellence for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, Derby Royal Hospital, Derby DE22 3DT, UK.
J Exp Biol. 2016 Jan;219(Pt 2):276-84. doi: 10.1242/jeb.128017.
The relationship between muscle structure and function has been a matter of investigation since the Renaissance period. Extensive use of anatomical dissections and the introduction of the scientific method enabled early scholars to lay the foundations of muscle physiology and biomechanics. Progression of knowledge in these disciplines led to the current understanding that muscle architecture, together with muscle fibre contractile properties, has a major influence on muscle mechanical properties. Recently, advances in laser diffraction, optical microendoscopy and ultrasonography have enabled in vivo investigations into the behaviour of human muscle fascicles and sarcomeres with varying joint angle and muscle contraction intensity. With these technologies it has become possible to identify the length region over which fascicles and sarcomeres develop maximum isometric force in vivo as well as the operating ranges of fascicles and sarcomeres during real-life activities such as walking. Also, greater insights into the remodelling of muscle architecture in response to overloading and unloading, and in ageing, have been obtained by the use of ultrasonography; these have led to the identification of clinical biomarkers of disuse atrophy and sarcopenia. Recent evidence also shows that the pattern of muscle hypertrophy in response to chronic loading is contraction-mode dependent (eccentric versus concentric), as similar gains in muscle mass, but through differing addition of sarcomeres in series and in parallel (as indirectly inferred from changes in fascicle length and pennation angle), have been found. These innovative observations prompted a new set of investigations into the molecular mechanisms regulating this contraction-specific muscle growth.
自文艺复兴时期以来,肌肉结构与功能之间的关系一直是研究的课题。解剖学解剖的广泛应用以及科学方法的引入,使早期学者得以奠定肌肉生理学和生物力学的基础。这些学科知识的进步导致了目前的认识,即肌肉结构与肌肉纤维收缩特性一起,对肌肉力学特性有重大影响。最近,激光衍射、光学显微内镜检查和超声检查技术的进步,使得在体内研究不同关节角度和肌肉收缩强度下人体肌肉束和肌节的行为成为可能。借助这些技术,已经能够确定肌肉束和肌节在体内产生最大等长力的长度范围,以及在诸如行走等实际活动中肌肉束和肌节的工作范围。此外,通过使用超声检查,人们对肌肉结构在过载、卸载和衰老反应中的重塑有了更深入的了解;这些研究已经确定了废用性萎缩和肌肉减少症的临床生物标志物。最近的证据还表明,慢性负荷下肌肉肥大的模式取决于收缩模式(离心收缩与向心收缩),因为发现肌肉质量有相似的增加,但串联和并联肌节的添加方式不同(从肌肉束长度和羽状角的变化间接推断)。这些创新性的观察结果促使人们对调节这种收缩特异性肌肉生长的分子机制进行了一系列新的研究。
J Exp Biol. 2016-1
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003-9
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2005-12
Exp Gerontol. 2013-7-22
Muscle Nerve. 2004-4
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2025
Radiol Oncol. 2025-6-16