Cheng Zhe, Teo Guoshou, Krueger Sabrina, Rock Tara M, Koh Hiromi W L, Choi Hyungwon, Vogel Christine
Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Singapore, Singapore National University Health System, Singapore.
Mol Syst Biol. 2016 Jan 20;12(1):855. doi: 10.15252/msb.20156423.
The relative importance of regulation at the mRNA versus protein level is subject to ongoing debate. To address this question in a dynamic system, we mapped proteomic and transcriptomic changes in mammalian cells responding to stress induced by dithiothreitol over 30 h. Specifically, we estimated the kinetic parameters for the synthesis and degradation of RNA and proteins, and deconvoluted the response patterns into common and unique to each regulatory level using a new statistical tool. Overall, the two regulatory levels were equally important, but differed in their impact on molecule concentrations. Both mRNA and protein changes peaked between two and eight hours, but mRNA expression fold changes were much smaller than those of the proteins. mRNA concentrations shifted in a transient, pulse-like pattern and returned to values close to pre-treatment levels by the end of the experiment. In contrast, protein concentrations switched only once and established a new steady state, consistent with the dominant role of protein regulation during misfolding stress. Finally, we generated hypotheses on specific regulatory modes for some genes.
mRNA水平与蛋白质水平调控的相对重要性一直是争论的焦点。为了在动态系统中解决这个问题,我们绘制了哺乳动物细胞在30小时内对二硫苏糖醇诱导的应激反应中的蛋白质组和转录组变化。具体而言,我们估计了RNA和蛋白质合成与降解的动力学参数,并使用一种新的统计工具将反应模式解卷积为每个调控水平共有的和独特的模式。总体而言,这两个调控水平同样重要,但对分子浓度的影响不同。mRNA和蛋白质的变化在两到八小时之间达到峰值,但mRNA表达倍数变化远小于蛋白质。mRNA浓度以瞬时、脉冲状模式变化,并在实验结束时恢复到接近预处理水平的值。相比之下,蛋白质浓度只切换一次并建立了新的稳态,这与错误折叠应激期间蛋白质调控的主导作用一致。最后,我们对一些基因的特定调控模式提出了假设。