White Abby, Kucukak Suden, Lee Daniel N, Swanson Scott J
Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr;101(4):1334-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.070. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
Mechanical staplers are widely employed in minimally invasive anatomic lung resections, but have limitations when managing smaller pulmonary arterial and venous branches. Published data is lacking regarding the safety and efficacy of pulmonary vessel ligation using ultrasonic shears. We describe a single-surgeon experience employing ultrasonic shears for the ligation of pulmonary vasculature during lobectomy and segmentectomy, primarily in the setting of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) resection.
A retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients, who underwent anatomic resection, between 2008 and 2014. Charts were divided into 2 groups based on method of ligation (energy based or conventional). Dictated operative reports were reviewed and patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and complications were recorded.
Ultrasonic shears were used for pulmonary vessel ligation (5 to 6 mm) in 82 of 283 anatomic resections. A total of 118 vessels were ligated with ultrasonic shears. The majority of patients (83%) in the energy-based ligation group underwent VATS resection. There were fewer complications in the energy-based ligation group (26% vs 38%; p = 0.05); however, rates of intraoperative transfusion, prolonged air leak, empyema, and return to the operating room were similar across the 2 groups, and no statistically significant difference was found. There were no postoperative complications directly attributable to ultrasonic vessel ligation.
Energy-based ligation of small-diameter pulmonary vessels is a safe and useful adjunct in anatomic VATS resection and a viable alternative to mechanical stapling. Its narrow profile and thin blades make it ideal for ligation of pulmonary vasculature, particularly where the size and necessary clearance of mechanical staplers prohibit safe dissection.
机械吻合器广泛应用于微创解剖性肺切除术,但在处理较小的肺动脉和静脉分支时存在局限性。目前缺乏关于使用超声刀进行肺血管结扎的安全性和有效性的公开数据。我们描述了一位外科医生在肺叶切除术和肺段切除术中主要在电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)切除情况下使用超声刀结扎肺血管的经验。
对2008年至2014年间所有接受解剖性切除术的患者进行回顾性病历审查。根据结扎方法(基于能量或传统方法)将病历分为两组。审查口述手术报告并记录患者人口统计学、肿瘤特征和并发症。
在283例解剖性切除术中,82例使用超声刀进行肺血管结扎(5至6毫米)。总共用超声刀结扎了118根血管。基于能量结扎组的大多数患者(83%)接受了VATS切除。基于能量结扎组的并发症较少(26%对38%;p = 0.05);然而,两组术中输血率、持续漏气、脓胸和返回手术室的发生率相似,未发现统计学上的显著差异。没有术后并发症直接归因于超声血管结扎。
基于能量的小直径肺血管结扎是解剖性VATS切除中一种安全且有用的辅助手段,是机械吻合的可行替代方法。其外形窄、刀片薄,使其成为肺血管结扎的理想工具,特别是在机械吻合器的尺寸和所需间隙禁止安全解剖的情况下。