Davis Aaron M, Pradolin Jordan
Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER), James Cook University , Townsville, Australia.
J Agric Food Chem. 2016 May 25;64(20):4021-8. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b04987. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
This study compared water quality benefits of using precision herbicide application technologies in relation to traditional spraying approaches across several pre- and postemergent herbicides in furrow-irrigated canefarming systems. The use of shielded sprayers (herbicide banding) provided herbicide load reductions extending substantially beyond simple proportionate decreases in amount of active herbicide ingredient applied to paddocks. These reductions were due largely to the extra management control available to irrigating growers in relation to where both herbicides and irrigation water can be applied to paddocks, coupled with knowledge of herbicide toxicological and physicochemical properties. Despite more complex herbicide mixtures being applied in banded practices, banding provided capacity for greatly reduced environmental toxicity in off-paddock losses. Similar toxicological and loss profiles of alternative herbicides relative to recently regulated pre-emergent herbicides highlight the need for a carefully considered approach to integrating alternative herbicides into improved pest management.
本研究比较了在沟灌甘蔗种植系统中,使用精准除草剂施用技术与传统喷雾方法相比,对几种苗前和苗后除草剂的水质改善效果。使用屏蔽喷雾器(除草剂带状施用)可减少除草剂用量,其减少幅度大大超过施用于田块的活性除草剂成分用量的简单比例下降。这些减少主要归因于灌溉种植者在田块中除草剂和灌溉水施用位置方面可获得的额外管理控制,以及对除草剂毒理学和物理化学性质的了解。尽管带状施用中使用了更复杂的除草剂混合物,但带状施用能够大幅降低田块外损失中的环境毒性。与最近受监管的苗前除草剂相比,替代除草剂具有相似的毒理学和损失特征,这凸显了在将替代除草剂纳入改进的害虫管理时需要采取谨慎考虑的方法。