Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER), James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER), James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Aug 15;490:81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 May 21.
Industry transitions away from traditional photosystem II inhibiting (PSII) herbicides towards an 'alternative' herbicide suite are now widely advocated as a key component of improved environmental outcomes for Australia's Great Barrier Reef and improved environmental stewardship on the part of the Queensland sugar industry. A systematic desktop risk analysis found that based on current farming practices, traditional PSII herbicides can pose significant environmental risks. Several of the 'alternatives' that can directly fill a specific pre-emergent ('soil residual') weed control function similar to regulated PSII herbicides also, however, presented a similar environmental risk profile, regardless of farming systems and bio-climatic zones being considered. Several alternatives with a pre-emergent residual function as well as alternative post-emergent (contact or 'knockdown') herbicides were, predicted to pose lower environmental risks than the regulated PSII herbicides to most trophic levels, although environmental risks could still be present. While several herbicides may well be viable alternatives in terms of weed control, they can still present equal or possibly higher risks to the environment. Imposing additional regulations (or even de-registrations) on particular herbicides could result in marginal, and possibly perverse environmental impacts in the long term, if usage shifts to alternative herbicides with similar risk profiles. Regardless of any regulatory efforts, improved environmental sustainability outcomes in pesticide practices within the Great Barrier Reef catchment area will hinge primarily on the continuing adoption of integrated, strategic pest management systems and technologies applied to both traditional and 'alternative' herbicides. One of the emerging policy challenges is ensuring the requisite technical and extension support for cane growers to ensure effective adoption of rapidly evolving farming system technologies, in a very dynamic and scrutinised herbicide management environment.
目前,业界普遍主张,将传统的光系统 II 抑制剂(PSII)除草剂逐步淘汰,转而采用“替代”除草剂组合,这是改善澳大利亚大堡礁环境成果和昆士兰州糖业加强环境管理的关键措施之一。通过系统的桌面风险分析发现,基于当前的农业实践,传统 PSII 除草剂可能会带来重大的环境风险。然而,一些可以直接替代具有监管 PSII 除草剂类似的前期(土壤残留)除草功能的“替代”除草剂,也具有类似的环境风险特征,而不论所考虑的农业系统和生物气候区如何。一些具有前期残留功能的替代除草剂以及替代后期(接触或“击倒”)除草剂,预计比受监管的 PSII 除草剂对大多数营养级别的环境风险要低,尽管仍然存在环境风险。虽然从杂草控制的角度来看,几种除草剂可能是可行的替代品,但它们对环境的风险仍然可能相同或更高。如果对某些除草剂施加额外的规定(甚至取消登记),可能会导致长期的边际甚至反常的环境影响,如果使用转向具有类似风险特征的替代除草剂。无论采取何种监管措施,大堡礁集水区内农药实践的环境可持续性改善结果,主要取决于继续采用综合的、战略性的病虫害管理系统和技术,这些系统和技术适用于传统和“替代”除草剂。一个新出现的政策挑战是,确保为甘蔗种植者提供必要的技术和推广支持,以确保在非常动态和受到严格审查的除草剂管理环境中,有效采用快速发展的农业系统技术。