Cho Kang Hee, Beom Jaewon, Yuk Jee Hyun, Ahn Seung-Chan
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
Ann Rehabil Med. 2015 Dec;39(6):971-9. doi: 10.5535/arm.2015.39.6.971. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
To investigate the effects of body mass composition and cushion type on seat-interface pressure in spinal cord injured (SCI) patients and healthy subjects.
Twenty SCI patients and control subjects were included and their body mass composition measured. Seat-interface pressure was measured with participants in an upright sitting posture on a wheelchair with three kinds of seat cushion and without a seat cushion. We also measured the pressure with each participant in three kinds of sitting postures on each air-filled cushion. We used repeated measure ANOVA, the Mann-Whitney test, and Spearman correlation coefficient for statistical analysis.
The total skeletal muscle mass and body water in the lower extremities were significantly higher in the control group, whilst body fat was significantly higher in the SCI group. However, the seat-interface pressure and body mass composition were not significantly correlated in both groups. Each of the three types of seat cushion resulted in significant reduction in the seat-interface pressure. The SCI group had significantly higher seatinterface pressure than the control group regardless of cushion type or sitting posture. The three kinds of sitting posture did not result in a significant reduction of seat-interface pressure.
We confirmed that the body mass composition does not have a direct effect on seat-interface pressure. However, a reduction of skeletal muscle mass and body water can influence the occurrence of pressure ulcers. Furthermore, in order to minimize seat-interface pressure, it is necessary to apply a method fitted to each individual rather than a uniform method.
探讨身体成分和坐垫类型对脊髓损伤(SCI)患者及健康受试者座椅界面压力的影响。
纳入20例SCI患者和对照受试者,测量其身体成分。让参与者在轮椅上以直立坐姿,使用三种坐垫和不使用坐垫的情况下测量座椅界面压力。我们还在每个充气坐垫上让每位参与者以三种坐姿测量压力。采用重复测量方差分析、曼-惠特尼检验和斯皮尔曼相关系数进行统计分析。
对照组下肢总骨骼肌质量和身体水分显著更高,而SCI组体脂显著更高。然而,两组的座椅界面压力与身体成分均无显著相关性。三种坐垫中的每一种都能显著降低座椅界面压力。无论坐垫类型或坐姿如何,SCI组的座椅界面压力均显著高于对照组。三种坐姿并未显著降低座椅界面压力。
我们证实身体成分对座椅界面压力没有直接影响。然而,骨骼肌质量和身体水分的减少会影响压疮的发生。此外,为了使座椅界面压力最小化,有必要采用适合个体的方法而非统一的方法。