Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China (Department of Industrial Design).
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020 Sep 17;33(5):675-689. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01582. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of the seat cushion contour and the sitting posture on the seat pan interface pressure distribution and subjective comfort perception.
Overall, 16 volunteers typed a text passage on a laptop while seated, by assuming 3 kinds of common sitting postures (forward, relaxed and upright) in 4 seat cushion configurations: chair only, and chair with 1 of 3 supplementary cushions. Pressure data and cushion comfort ratings were collected in the experiment.
It was found that the sitting posture and the seat cushion contour had different impacts on surface pressure. The seat cushion contour had an impact on pressure parameters and pressure distribution on the seat pan, while the sitting posture affected the location of peak pressure on the seat pan. The correlation analysis revealed that the subjective comfort rating was significantly correlated with average pressure (AP) and mean peak pressure (MPP).
The conclusion was that the cushion contour had a greater effect on seat pan interface pressure parameters than the sitting posture. Notably, AP and MPP can be indicators for assessing seat cushion comfort in a short-term perspective. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020;33(5):675-89.
本文旨在研究座垫轮廓和坐姿对座垫界面压力分布和主观舒适感的影响。
共有 16 名志愿者在坐姿状态下通过假设 3 种常见坐姿(前倾、放松和笔直)在 4 种座垫配置(仅椅子、以及椅子加上 3 种补充座垫中的 1 种)下使用膝上型电脑输入一段文本。在实验中收集了压力数据和座垫舒适度评分。
研究发现,坐姿和座垫轮廓对表面压力有不同的影响。座垫轮廓影响座垫表面的压力参数和压力分布,而坐姿则影响座垫上峰值压力的位置。相关分析表明,主观舒适度评分与平均压力(AP)和平均峰值压力(MPP)显著相关。
座垫轮廓对座垫界面压力参数的影响大于坐姿。值得注意的是,AP 和 MPP 可以作为评估座垫舒适度的短期指标。国际职业医学与环境卫生杂志。2020;33(5):675-89.