Stewart Robert, Perez Ricardo, Musial Bogdan, Lukens Carrie, Adjepong Yaw Amoateng, Manthous Constantine A
1 Department of Internal Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
2 Hospital of Central Connecticut, New Britain, Connecticut.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Feb;13(2):248-52. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201507-448BC.
High doses of sedating drugs are often used to manage critically ill patients with alcohol withdrawal syndrome.
To describe outcomes and risks for pneumonia and endotracheal intubation in patients with alcohol withdrawal syndrome treated with high-dose intravenous sedatives and deferred endotracheal intubation.
Observational cohort study of consecutive patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a university-affiliated, community hospital for alcohol withdrawal syndrome, where patients were not routinely intubated to receive high-dose or continuously infused sedating medications.
We studied 188 patients hospitalized with alcohol withdrawal syndrome from 2008 through 2012 at one medical center. The mean age (SD) of the subjects was 50.8 ± 9.0 years and their mean ICU admission APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) II score was 6.2 ± 3.4. Thirty subjects (16%) developed pneumonia, and 38 (20.2%) required intubation. All of the 188 patients received lorazepam (median total dose, 42.5 mg), and 170 of 188 received midazolam, all but 2 by continuous intravenous infusion (median total dose, 527 mg; all administered in ICU); 19 received propofol (median total dose, 6,000 mg); and 19 received dexmedetomidine (median total dose, 1,075 mg). Intubated patients received substantially more benzodiazepine (median total dose, 761 mg of lorazepam equivalent vs. 229 mg for subjects in the nonintubated group; P < 0.0001). Endotracheal intubation was associated with pneumonia and higher acuity of illness (APACHE II score, >10). Intubated patients had a longer duration of hospital stay (median, 15 d vs. 6 d; P ≤ 0.0001). One patient did not survive hospitalization.
In this single-center, observational study, where endotracheal intubation was deferred until aspiration or cardiopulmonary decompensation, treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome with high-dose, continuously infused sedating medications was not associated with excess morbidity or mortality.
高剂量镇静药物常用于治疗患有酒精戒断综合征的重症患者。
描述接受高剂量静脉镇静剂治疗且延迟气管插管的酒精戒断综合征患者发生肺炎和气管插管的结局及风险。
对一所大学附属医院社区医院重症监护病房(ICU)连续收治的酒精戒断综合征患者进行观察性队列研究,这些患者在接受高剂量或持续输注镇静药物时未常规插管。
我们研究了2008年至2012年在一家医疗中心住院的188例酒精戒断综合征患者。受试者的平均年龄(标准差)为50.8±9.0岁,其入住ICU时的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)II评分为6.2±3.4。30名受试者(16%)发生了肺炎,38名(20.2%)需要插管。188例患者均接受了劳拉西泮(中位总剂量,42.5mg),188例中有170例接受了咪达唑仑,除2例通过持续静脉输注(中位总剂量,527mg;均在ICU给药);19例接受了丙泊酚(中位总剂量,6000mg);19例接受了右美托咪定(中位总剂量,1075mg)。插管患者接受的苯二氮䓬类药物明显更多(中位总剂量,相当于761mg劳拉西泮,而非插管组受试者为229mg;P<0.0001)。气管插管与肺炎及更高的疾病严重程度(APACHE II评分>10)相关。插管患者的住院时间更长(中位值,15天对6天;P≤0.0001)。1例患者住院期间未存活。
在这项单中心观察性研究中,气管插管延迟至出现误吸或心肺失代偿时进行,使用高剂量持续输注镇静药物治疗酒精戒断综合征与额外的发病率或死亡率无关。