Suppr超能文献

应对有性虐待史的患者:荷兰全科医生的横断面调查。

Dealing with patients facing a history of sexual abuse: A cross-sectional survey among Dutch general practitioners.

作者信息

Birkhoff Eleonore M L, Krouwel Esmée M, Nicolai Melianthe P J, de Boer Bert-Jan, Beck Jack J, Putter Hein, Pelger Rob C M, Elzevier Henk W

机构信息

a Department of Urology , Leiden University Medical Centre , Leiden , The Netherlands ;

b General practitioner and sexologist, Maarsen , The Netherlands ;

出版信息

Eur J Gen Pract. 2016 Jun;22(2):126-33. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1122752. Epub 2016 Jan 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sexual abuse (SA) is a common problem. As the primary confidant, the general practitioner (GP) has a valuable role in identifying a history of abuse, specifically with regard to the commonly performed pelvic examination for cervical cancer screening.

OBJECTIVES

This study focused on GPs' practice patterns, knowledge, training need and barriers concerning asking patients about SA. Furthermore, it was investigated who performs the cervical smear within the practice and if SA is taken into consideration.

METHODS

The authors constructed a 31-item questionnaire, which was sent to a group of 730 Dutch GPs in September 2012.

RESULTS

The response rate was 49.3%. Half of the 357 responding GPs asked their patients about SA sometimes. The majority (76.2%) stated they had some knowledge of SA. The most important barriers for not asking were 'no angle or motive for asking' (81.6%), 'presence of third parties' (73.1%), and 'not enough training' (54.1%). In most practices (84.3%), the nurse practitioner (NP) was assigned to perform the cervical smears, of which 34.8% presumably never ask about SA in advance. Additional training was in need according to 68.6%. GPs desired a clinical practice guideline regarding the counselling of SA (83.5%).

CONCLUSION

This study showed SA is an under-evaluated problem in general practice, yet GPs are motivated to improve knowledge and counselling skills. NPs perform most of the cervical smears, but the majority never or rarely asked about SA in advance. Educational training and a clinical guideline regarding SA would be appreciated and hence recommended.

摘要

背景

性虐待是一个常见问题。作为主要的知心人,全科医生在识别虐待史方面发挥着重要作用,特别是在宫颈癌筛查中常见的盆腔检查方面。

目的

本研究聚焦于全科医生询问患者性虐待情况的执业模式、知识、培训需求及障碍。此外,还调查了诊所内谁进行宫颈涂片检查以及是否考虑性虐待因素。

方法

作者编制了一份包含31个条目的问卷,并于2012年9月发送给730名荷兰全科医生。

结果

回复率为49.3%。在357名回复的全科医生中,有一半有时会询问患者性虐待情况。大多数(76.2%)表示他们对性虐待有一定了解。不询问的最重要障碍是“没有询问的角度或动机”(81.6%)、“有第三方在场”(73.1%)以及“培训不足”(54.1%)。在大多数诊所(84.3%),护士从业者被指定进行宫颈涂片检查,其中34.8%的人可能从未提前询问过性虐待情况。68.6%的人认为需要额外培训。全科医生希望有关于性虐待咨询的临床实践指南(83.5%)。

结论

本研究表明,在全科医疗中,性虐待是一个未得到充分评估的问题,但全科医生有动力提高相关知识和咨询技能。护士从业者进行大部分宫颈涂片检查,但大多数人从未或很少提前询问性虐待情况。关于性虐待的教育培训和临床指南将受到欢迎,因此建议制定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验