Weinberg S L, Yacker N L, Orenstein S H, DeSarbo W
Multivariate Behav Res. 1993 Oct 1;28(4):435-65. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2804_3.
In contrast to Kohlberg's (1969) universal model of moral development, Gilligan's (1982) model posits the existence of separate patterns of moral development for men and women. The pattern for men, termed the "justice ethic," is based on abstract concepts of justice, reciprocity, and individual rights. The pattern for women, termed the "care ethic," is based on responsibility toward others and the preservation of relationships. The purpose of this article is to utilize a recently developed multidimensional scaling methodology to explore the underlying structure of moral reasoning responses to 12 moral dilemmas, developed on the basis of Gilligan's theory, and to relate that structure to individual difference characteristics. Results of findings and implications for future research are discussed.
与科尔伯格(1969年)的道德发展通用模型形成对比的是,吉利根(1982年)的模型假定男性和女性存在不同的道德发展模式。男性的模式被称为“正义伦理”,它基于正义、互惠和个人权利的抽象概念。女性的模式被称为“关怀伦理”,它基于对他人的责任和关系的维系。本文的目的是运用一种最近开发的多维标度法,来探究基于吉利根理论构建的12个道德困境的道德推理反应的潜在结构,并将该结构与个体差异特征联系起来。文中讨论了研究结果以及对未来研究的启示。