Hua Xingyi, Tao Hui, Fang Wang, Tang Jian
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No.218 Ji-xi Road,Hefei, Anhui, 230022, People's Republic of China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jan 22;17:41. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0894-1.
Multiple-ligament injured knee (MLIK) is a rare but severe injury. Although the principles of MLIK management have progressed over the past 40 years, there is a paucity of high-quality evidence upon which to base the management of MLIK. Treatment strategies for MLIK are challenging for most orthopedic surgeons, and the optimal treatment remains controversial, especially with regard to repair vs. reconstruction of the ligaments. The aim of the present study was to observe clinical outcomes of single-stage in situ suture repair of knee dislocation with multiple-ligament injury using nonabsorbable suture material.
Consecutive patients with MLIK between 2002 and 2010 were included, for a total of 25 patients with knee dislocation. 17 patients (18 knees) with closed knee dislocation with a mean follow-up of 4.8 ± 1.3 years were retrospective analyzed. All patients were treated surgically with single-stage in situ suture repair for all injured ligaments and followed a standardized postoperative rehabilitation protocol. The VAS score, satisfactory score, total SF-36 score, Lysholm score, Tegner score, the Meyers functional rating and the ranges of motion and knee stability were used to evaluate outcomes.
At final follow-up, mean visual analog scale score was 2.4 ± 0.9, patient satisfaction score was 8.0 ± 1.1, 36-item Short-Form Health Survey total score was 85.5 ± 10.4, and mean Lysholm score was 87.5 ± 7.7. There were significant differences between mean preinjury and postoperative Tegner activity scores (5.6 ± 1.4 and 3.4 ± 1.7, respectively; P < 0.01) and in mean range of motion between the injured and contralateral knees (112.5 ± 8.4° and 129.6 ± 10.3°, respectively; P < 0.01). At final follow-up, no patient demonstrated obvious ligamentous laxity, and only one patient was unable to return to work. Three patients had knee joint stiffness, two had wound problems (infection or fat liquefaction), and two had heterotopic bone formation.
Single-stage in situ suture repair of injured ligaments confers advantages of reliable fixation and early exercise. It could be considered as an alternate and effective option in the dislocation knee with multiple-ligament injury.
膝关节多韧带损伤(MLIK)是一种罕见但严重的损伤。尽管在过去40年里MLIK的治疗原则有所进展,但用于指导MLIK治疗的高质量证据仍然匮乏。对于大多数骨科医生来说,MLIK的治疗策略具有挑战性,最佳治疗方案仍存在争议,尤其是在韧带修复与重建方面。本研究的目的是观察使用不可吸收缝合材料对膝关节脱位合并多韧带损伤进行一期原位缝合修复的临床效果。
纳入2002年至2010年间连续的MLIK患者,共25例膝关节脱位患者。对17例闭合性膝关节脱位患者(18个膝关节)进行回顾性分析,平均随访时间为4.8±1.3年。所有患者均接受手术治疗,对所有损伤韧带进行一期原位缝合修复,并遵循标准化的术后康复方案。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)、满意度评分、36项简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)总分、Lysholm评分、Tegner评分、迈尔斯功能评分以及活动范围和膝关节稳定性来评估治疗效果。
末次随访时,平均VAS评分为2.4±0.9,患者满意度评分为8.0±1.1,SF-36总分85.5±10.4,平均Lysholm评分为87.5±7.7。伤前与术后Tegner活动评分均值之间(分别为5.6±1.4和3.4±1.7;P<0.01)以及患侧与对侧膝关节平均活动范围之间(分别为112.5±8.4°和129.6±10.3°;P<0.01)存在显著差异。末次随访时,没有患者表现出明显的韧带松弛,只有1例患者无法重返工作岗位。3例患者出现膝关节僵硬,2例出现伤口问题(感染或脂肪液化),2例出现异位骨化。
对损伤韧带进行一期原位缝合修复具有固定可靠和早期锻炼的优势。它可被视为膝关节脱位合并多韧带损伤的一种替代且有效的治疗选择。