De la Fuente Carlos, Peña y Lillo Roberto, Carreño Gabriel, Marambio Hugo
Biomechanics Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Médicas del Instituto Traumatológico "Teodoro Gebauer Weisser", Santiago 8340220, Chile; Carrera de Kinesiología, UDA Cs Salud, Facultad Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile; Mechanics Department, Engineer Faculty, USACH, Santiago 717835, Chile; Kinesiology and Clinical Biomechanics Program, UMCE, Santiago 7780450, Chile.
Foot and Ankle Unit, Instituto Traumatológico "Teodoro Gebauer Weisser", Santiago 8340220, Chile; Servicio de Kinesiterapia y Terapia Ocupacional, Instituto Traumatológico "Teodoro Gebauer Weisser", Santiago 8340220, Chile.
Foot (Edinb). 2016 Mar;26:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2015.10.003. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
Rupture of the Achilles tendon is a common injury during working years. Aggressive rehabilitation may provide better outcomes, but also a greater chance of re-rupture.
To determine if aggressive rehabilitation has better clinical outcomes for Achilles tendon function, Triceps surae function, one-leg heel rise capacity and lower complication rate during twelve weeks after percutaneous Achilles tendon repair compared to conventional rehabilitation.
Randomized controlled trial.
Thirty-nine patients were prospectively randomized. The aggressive group (n=20, 41.4 ± 8.3 years) received rehabilitation from the first day after surgery. The conventional group (n=19, 41.7 ± 10.7 years) rested for 28 days, before rehabilitation started. The statistical parameters were the Achilles tendon rupture score (ATRS), verbal pain scale, time to return to work, pain medication consumption, Achilles tendon strength, dorsiflexion range of motion (RoM), injured-leg calf circumference, calf circumference difference, one-leg heel rise repetition and difference, re-rupture rate, strength deficit rate, and other complication rates. Mixed-ANOVA and Bonferroni's post hoc test were performed for multiple comparisons. Student's t-test was performed for parameters measured on the 12th week.
The aggressive group with respect to the conventional group had a higher ATRS; lower verbal pain score; lower pain medication consumption; early return to work; higher Achilles tendon strength; higher one-leg heel rise repetitions; and lower one-leg heel rise difference. The re-rupture rate was 5% and 5%, the strength deficit rate was 42% and 5%, and other complications rate was 11% and 15% in the conventional and aggressive group, respectively.
Patients with Dresden repair and aggressive rehabilitation have better clinical outcomes, Achilles tendon function and one-leg heel rise capacity without increasing the postoperative complications rate after 12 weeks compared to rehabilitation with immobilization and non-weight-bearing during the first 28 days after surgery.
跟腱断裂是工作年龄段的常见损伤。积极的康复治疗可能会带来更好的效果,但再次断裂的几率也更高。
确定与传统康复相比,在经皮跟腱修复术后12周内,积极的康复治疗在跟腱功能、小腿三头肌功能、单腿提踵能力方面是否具有更好的临床效果以及更低的并发症发生率。
随机对照试验。
39例患者被前瞻性随机分组。积极康复组(n = 20,年龄41.4 ± 8.3岁)术后第一天即开始康复治疗。传统康复组(n = 19,年龄41.7 ± 10.7岁)休息28天,之后开始康复治疗。统计参数包括跟腱断裂评分(ATRS)、视觉疼痛量表、重返工作时间、止痛药物消耗量、跟腱力量、背屈活动度(RoM)、患侧小腿围度、小腿围度差值、单腿提踵重复次数及差值、再断裂率、力量 deficit率以及其他并发症发生率。采用混合方差分析和Bonferroni事后检验进行多重比较。对第12周测量的参数进行学生t检验。
与传统康复组相比,积极康复组的ATRS更高;视觉疼痛评分更低;止痛药物消耗量更低;更早重返工作;跟腱力量更强;单腿提踵重复次数更多;单腿提踵差值更小。传统康复组和积极康复组的再断裂率分别为5%和5%,力量 deficit率分别为42%和5%,其他并发症发生率分别为11%和15%。
与术后前28天采用固定和不负重康复相比,采用德累斯顿修复术及积极康复治疗后的患者在12周后具有更好的临床效果、跟腱功能和单腿提踵能力,且未增加术后并发症发生率。