Rotte K H, Klühs L, Kleinau H, Kriedemann E
Central Institute for Cancer Research, Academy of Sciences, Berlin-Buch, GDR.
Eur J Radiol. 1989 Aug;9(3):187-90.
In 30 patients with rectal carcinoma the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and endosonography (ES) was compared with the surgical specimen. Three cases were overstaged by ES and 4 cases were understaged by CT. The accuracy of ES was 84% and of CT only 76%. Both methods had advantages and limitations. An accurate staging of lymph node metastases was possible neither by ES nor by CT. - We advocate endosonography as the first imaging examination after proctoscopy. CT is recommended in endosonographic doubtful findings and in tight stenoses.
在30例直肠癌患者中,将计算机断层扫描(CT)和内镜超声检查(ES)的结果与手术标本进行了比较。ES对3例患者分期过高,CT对4例患者分期过低。ES的准确率为84%,CT仅为76%。两种方法都有优点和局限性。ES和CT都无法准确对淋巴结转移进行分期。——我们提倡将内镜超声检查作为直肠镜检查后的首选影像学检查。对于内镜超声检查结果存疑及严重狭窄的情况,建议进行CT检查。