Suppr超能文献

医疗重症监护病房中替代决策者的决策冲突与遗憾

Decision conflict and regret among surrogate decision makers in the medical intensive care unit.

作者信息

Miller Jesse J, Morris Peter, Files D Clark, Gower Emily, Young Michael

机构信息

Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Winston Salem, NC 27012.

Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Ophthalmology, Winston Salem, NC 27012.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2016 Apr;32:79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.11.023. Epub 2015 Dec 8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Family members of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit face significant morbidity. It may be the decision-making process that plays a significant role in the psychological morbidity associated with being a surrogate in the ICU. We hypothesize that family members facing end-of-life decisions will have more decisional conflict and decisional regret than those facing non-end-of-life decisions.

METHODS

We enrolled a sample of adult patients and their surrogates in a tertiary care, academic medical intensive care unit. We queried the surrogates regarding decisions they had made on behalf of the patient and assessed decision conflict. We then contacted the family member again to assess decision regret.

RESULTS

Forty (95%) of 42 surrogates were able to identify at least 1 decision they had made on behalf of the patient. End-of-life decisions (defined as do not resuscitate [DNR]/do not intubate [DNI] or continuation of life support) accounted for 19 of 40 decisions (47.5%). Overall, the average Decision Conflict Scale (DCS) score was 21.9 of 100 (range 0-100, with 0 being little decisional conflict and 100 being great decisional conflict). The average DCS score for families facing end-of-life decisions was 25.5 compared with 18.7 for all other decisions. Those facing end-of-life decisions scored higher on the uncertainty subscale (subset of DCS questions that indicates level of certainty regarding decision) with a mean score of 43.4 compared with all other decisions with a mean score of 27.0. Overall, very few surrogates experienced decisional regret with an average DRS score of 13.4 of 100.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly all surrogates enrolled were faced with decision-making responsibilities on behalf of his or her critically ill family member. In our small pilot study, we found more decisional conflict in those surrogates facing end-of-life decisions, specifically on the subset of questions dealing with uncertainty. Surrogates report low levels of decisional regret.

摘要

引言

重症监护病房中重症患者的家属面临着较高的发病率。可能是决策过程在作为重症监护病房替代决策者所带来的心理发病率中起着重要作用。我们假设,面临临终决策的家属比面临非临终决策的家属会有更多的决策冲突和决策遗憾。

方法

我们在一家三级医疗学术性医学重症监护病房招募了成年患者及其替代决策者作为样本。我们询问替代决策者他们代表患者所做的决策,并评估决策冲突。然后我们再次联系家属以评估决策遗憾。

结果

42名替代决策者中有40名(95%)能够识别出至少一项他们代表患者做出的决策。临终决策(定义为不进行心肺复苏[DNR]/不插管[DNI]或继续维持生命支持)占40项决策中的19项(47.5%)。总体而言,决策冲突量表(DCS)的平均得分是100分中的21.9分(范围为0 - 100分,0分表示几乎没有决策冲突,100分表示决策冲突极大)。面临临终决策的家属的DCS平均得分为25.5分,而所有其他决策的平均得分为18.7分。在不确定性子量表(DCS问题的一个子集,表明对决策的确定程度)上,面临临终决策的家属得分更高,平均分为43.4分,而所有其他决策的平均分为27.0分。总体而言,很少有替代决策者经历决策遗憾,决策遗憾量表(DRS)的平均得分是100分中的13.4分。

结论

几乎所有纳入研究的替代决策者都代表其重症家庭成员承担了决策责任。在我们的小型试点研究中,我们发现面临临终决策的替代决策者存在更多的决策冲突,特别是在涉及不确定性的问题子集上。替代决策者报告的决策遗憾程度较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验