Kahalley Lisa S, Ris M Douglas, Grosshans David R, Okcu M Fatih, Paulino Arnold C, Chintagumpala Murali, Moore Bartlett D, Guffey Danielle, Minard Charles G, Stancel Heather H, Mahajan Anita
Lisa S. Kahalley, M. Douglas Ris, M. Fatih Okcu, Murali Chintagumpala, Danielle Guffey, Charles G. Minard, and Heather H. Stancel, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; and David R. Grosshans, Arnold C. Paulino, Bartlett D. Moore, and Anita Mahajan, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 1;34(10):1043-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.1383. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
Compared with photon radiation (XRT), proton beam radiation therapy (PBRT) reduces dose to normal tissues, which may lead to better neurocognitive outcomes. We compared change in intelligence quotient (IQ) over time in pediatric patients with brain tumors treated with PBRT versus XRT.
IQ scores were available for 150 patients (60 had received XRT, 90 had received PBRT). Linear mixed models examined change in IQ over time since radiation therapy (RT) by RT group, controlling for demographic/clinical characteristics. Craniospinal and focal RT subgroups were also examined.
In the PBRT group, no change in IQ over time was identified (P = .130), whereas in the XRT group, IQ declined by 1.1 points per year (P = .004). IQ slopes did not differ between groups (P = .509). IQ was lower in the XRT group (by 8.7 points) versus the PBRT group (P = .011). In the craniospinal subgroup, IQ remained stable in both the PBRT (P = .203) and XRT groups (P = .060), and IQ slopes did not differ (P = .890). IQ was lower in the XRT group (by 12.5 points) versus the PBRT group (P = .004). In the focal subgroup, IQ scores remained stable in the PBRT group (P = .401) but declined significantly in the XRT group by 1.57 points per year (P = .026). IQ slopes did not differ between groups (P = .342).
PBRT was not associated with IQ decline or impairment, yet IQ slopes did not differ between the PBRT and XRT groups. It remains unclear if PBRT results in clinically meaningful cognitive sparing that significantly exceeds that of modern XRT protocols. Additional long-term data are needed to fully understand the neurocognitive impact of PBRT in survivors of pediatric brain tumors.
与光子辐射(XRT)相比,质子束放射治疗(PBRT)可降低对正常组织的剂量,这可能带来更好的神经认知结果。我们比较了接受PBRT与XRT治疗的小儿脑肿瘤患者随时间推移的智商(IQ)变化。
150例患者有IQ评分(60例接受XRT,90例接受PBRT)。线性混合模型按放疗(RT)组检查自放疗后随时间的IQ变化,并控制人口统计学/临床特征。还对全脑脊髓放疗和局部放疗亚组进行了检查。
在PBRT组中,未发现IQ随时间变化(P = 0.130),而在XRT组中,IQ每年下降1.1分(P = 0.004)。两组间IQ斜率无差异(P = 0.509)。XRT组的IQ低于PBRT组(低8.7分)(P = 0.011)。在全脑脊髓放疗亚组中,PBRT组(P = 0.203)和XRT组(P = 0.060)的IQ均保持稳定,且IQ斜率无差异(P = 0.890)。XRT组的IQ低于PBRT组(低12.5分)(P = 0.004)。在局部放疗亚组中,PBRT组的IQ评分保持稳定(P = 0.401),而XRT组每年显著下降1.57分(P = 0.026)。两组间IQ斜率无差异(P = 0.342)。
PBRT与IQ下降或损害无关,但PBRT组和XRT组间的IQ斜率无差异。目前尚不清楚PBRT是否能带来临床上有意义的认知保护,显著超过现代XRT方案。需要更多长期数据来全面了解PBRT对小儿脑肿瘤幸存者的神经认知影响。