• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喹硫平在老年人中的安全性:一项系统文献综述。

Quetiapine safety in older adults: a systematic literature review.

作者信息

El-Saifi N, Moyle W, Jones C, Tuffaha H

机构信息

Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Feb;41(1):7-18. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12357.

DOI:10.1111/jcpt.12357
PMID:26813985
Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Quetiapine is a second-generation antipsychotic that is commonly prescribed for a range of approved and off-label indications in older adults. However, little is known about its safety in this population. The available evidence on quetiapine safety is based on studies on second-generation antipsychotics as a group, often in the general population and for approved indications. There are no systematic reviews on the safety of quetiapine in older adults, and therefore, there is a need for systematically assessing quetiapine safety in this group of patients to establish an appropriate safety profile for this vulnerable population. The aim of this paper was to review and describe adverse drug events associated with quetiapine use in older adults.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases searched were CINAHL, PubMed, Medline, PsycInfo and the Cochrane Library.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Sixty-nine papers met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the studies (n = 36, 52%) were observational, and 11 (16%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Most of the reported indications (75%) were off-label. The most commonly reported adverse events were somnolence (25-39%), dizziness (15-27%), headache (10-23%), postural hypotension (6-18%) and weight gain (11-30%). From the included RCTs, comparing quetiapine with placebo, quetiapine resulted in significantly greater cognitive impairment, higher rates of falls and injury and increased mortality in patients with parkinsonism, but not in patients with dementia. Compared with risperidone and olanzapine, quetiapine had significantly lower risk of mortality, reduced rate of cerebrovascular events, increased rate of falls and injury and less metabolic disorders compared with olanzapine, but higher metabolic disorders compared with risperidone.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

This work provides full characterization of quetiapine safety in older people, which may help healthcare providers better anticipate, prevent and manage ADEs in this population.

摘要

已知信息与研究目的

喹硫平是一种第二代抗精神病药物,常用于老年人一系列已获批和未获批的适应症。然而,对于其在该人群中的安全性知之甚少。现有的关于喹硫平安全性的证据基于对第二代抗精神病药物作为一个整体的研究,这些研究通常在普通人群中进行,且针对已获批的适应症。目前尚无关于喹硫平在老年人中安全性的系统评价,因此,有必要系统评估该药物在这组患者中的安全性,以便为这一脆弱人群建立合适的安全性概况。本文的目的是回顾和描述与老年人使用喹硫平相关的药物不良事件。

方法

根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行系统的文献检索。检索的数据库包括CINAHL、PubMed、Medline、PsycInfo和Cochrane图书馆。

结果与讨论

69篇论文符合纳入标准。大多数研究(n = 36,52%)为观察性研究,11篇(16%)为随机对照试验(RCT)。报告的大多数适应症(75%)为未获批适应症。最常报告的不良事件为嗜睡(25 - 39%)、头晕(15 - 27%)、头痛(10 - 23%)、体位性低血压(6 - 18%)和体重增加(11 - 30%)。在纳入的RCT中,将喹硫平与安慰剂进行比较,喹硫平导致认知障碍显著更严重、帕金森病患者跌倒和受伤率更高以及死亡率增加,但在痴呆患者中并非如此。与利培酮和奥氮平相比,喹硫平的死亡率风险显著更低,脑血管事件发生率降低,跌倒和受伤率增加,与奥氮平相比代谢紊乱更少,但与利培酮相比代谢紊乱更多。

新内容与结论

本研究全面描述了喹硫平在老年人中的安全性,这可能有助于医疗保健提供者更好地预测、预防和管理该人群中的药物不良事件。

相似文献

1
Quetiapine safety in older adults: a systematic literature review.喹硫平在老年人中的安全性:一项系统文献综述。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Feb;41(1):7-18. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12357.
2
Atypical antipsychotics for disruptive behaviour disorders in children and youths.用于治疗儿童和青少年破坏性行为障碍的非典型抗精神病药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 9;8(8):CD008559. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008559.pub3.
3
Summary of the comparative effectiveness review on off-label use of atypical antipsychotics.非典型抗精神病药物超说明书使用的比较有效性评价综述
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Jun;18(5 Suppl B):S1-20. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.S5-B.1.
4
Chlorpromazine versus atypical antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia.氯丙嗪与非典型抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 5;4(4):CD010631. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010631.pub2.
5
Antipsychotics for fibromyalgia in adults.用于成人纤维肌痛的抗精神病药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 2;2016(6):CD011804. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011804.pub2.
6
Risperidone versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia.利培酮与其他非典型抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;2011(1):CD006626. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006626.pub2.
7
Atypical antipsychotics for disruptive behaviour disorders in children and youths.用于儿童和青少年破坏性行为障碍的非典型抗精神病药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD008559. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008559.pub2.
8
Clozapine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia.氯氮平与其他非典型抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10(11):CD006633. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006633.pub2.
9
Olanzapine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia.奥氮平与其他非典型抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;2010(3):CD006654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006654.pub2.
10
Risperidone (depot) for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的长效利培酮
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 14;4(4):CD004161. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004161.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Sedation and sleep safety of pimavanserin for Parkinsons's disease psychosis: Review and exploratory analysis of clinical study data.匹莫范色林用于帕金森病精神病的镇静作用及睡眠安全性:临床研究数据回顾与探索性分析
Clin Park Relat Disord. 2025 May 12;12:100342. doi: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100342. eCollection 2025.
2
Predictors and Moderators of Hospitalisation and Mortality in People with Dementia Using Antipsychotics: Systematic Review.使用抗精神病药物的痴呆症患者住院和死亡的预测因素及调节因素:系统评价
Drugs Aging. 2025 May;42(5):381-394. doi: 10.1007/s40266-025-01202-8. Epub 2025 Apr 5.
3
Drug-Induced Cognitive Impairment.
药物性认知障碍
Drug Saf. 2025 Apr;48(4):339-361. doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01506-5. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
4
Pharmacokinetic Prediction of Immediate- and Extended-Release Tablets for Patients with Liver Disease Using Whole Body Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for the Antipsychotic Drug Quetiapine.使用抗精神病药物喹硫平的全身生理药代动力学模型对肝病患者速释片和缓释片的药代动力学预测
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2024 Dec 5;26(1):8. doi: 10.1208/s12249-024-02995-4.
5
Identification of potentially causative drugs associated with hypotension: A scoping review.与低血压相关的潜在致病药物的识别:一项范围综述
Arch Pharm (Weinheim). 2025 Jan;358(1):e2400564. doi: 10.1002/ardp.202400564. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
6
Disparities by Socioeconomic Status and Diagnosis of Dementia in the Prescribing of Antipsychotics in a Real-World Data Population Over 60 Years of Age.社会经济地位差异与诊断痴呆症在 60 岁以上真实世界数据人群中抗精神病药物处方的关系。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;100(2):645-655. doi: 10.3233/JAD-240004.
7
Risk of renal impairment in atypical antipsychotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非典型抗精神病药致肾功能损害风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Oct;80(10):1435-1444. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03714-5. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
8
Falls and Fractures among Nursing Home Residents Treated with Pimavanserin versus Other Atypical Antipsychotics: Analysis of Medicare Beneficiaries with Parkinson's Disease Psychosis.匹莫范色林与其他非典型抗精神病药物治疗的养老院居民中的跌倒与骨折:对患有帕金森病精神病的医疗保险受益人的分析
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2024 Sep;11(3):441-449. doi: 10.1007/s40801-024-00433-2. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
9
Inappropriate quetiapine use at a large academic medical center: frequency of misuse and associated costs of adverse effects.大型学术医疗中心喹硫平的不当使用:误用频率及不良反应相关成本
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2023 Dec 6;14:20420986231213173. doi: 10.1177/20420986231213173. eCollection 2023.
10
Adverse events with quetiapine and clarithromycin coprescription: A population-based retrospective cohort study.喹硫平与克拉霉素联合处方的不良事件:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 23;6(6):e1375. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1375. eCollection 2023 Jun.