Benkabbou Amine, Souadka Amine, Serji Badr, Hachim Hajar, El Malki Hadj Omar, Mohsine Raouf, Ifrine Lahssan, Belkouchi Abdelkader
Tunis Med. 2015 Aug-Sep;93(8-9):523-6.
Over past decades laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has gained wide acceptance among hepatobiliary surgeons community. To date, few data are available concerning LLR programs in developing countries. This study aimed to assess feasibility and safety of LLR in a Moroccan surgical unit.
From June 2010 to February 2013, patients that received LLR were identified from a prospective "liver resection" database and included in this study. Parenchymal transection was performed using Harmonic scalpel and bipolar clamp with no Intraoperative ultrasound use or systematic pedicle clamping. LLR difficulty was categorized into 3 categories according to Louisville-statement (I-III). Demographic informations, liver lesion informations, operative details, pathological tumor-margin and 1-months postoperative morbidity according to Clavien-Dindo(C-D) classification were analyzed.
Among 104 patients who underwent liver resection 13(12,5%) had LLR. There were 7 females and 6 males with mean age of 57,5 ± 17 years. LLR was performed for benign lesions in 3 cases and malignant ones in 10 (77%) patients: hepatocarcinoma in 7 patients and synchronous rectal-liver metastasis in 3 patients. Lesions were solitary in 12 (92%) patients with median size of 50mm (15 mm-150 mm). Patients with liver metastasis received combined laparoscopic rectal and liver resection. We used pure laparoscopic approach in 12 (92%) patients and hybrid one in 1 patient. LLR difficulty was category I, II and II in respectively 3(23%), 6(46%) and 4(31%)patients. Conversion rate to open liver resection was 15%. Mean blood loss was 395 min ± 270 min with no hepatic pedicle clamping or peroperative blood transfusion. All resections were tumor free margin. Mortality rate was nil and morbidity occurred in 4(30%) patients: ascites (C-D 2) and pelvic sepsis in combined resections (CD 3b). Median hospital stay was 6 days.
Laparoscopic liver resection in our context is safe in selected patients, since no operative mortality, blood transfusion requirement or palliative resection was recorded and liver related morbidity rate was low. Intraoperative ultrasound liver examination capacities are mandatory to improve laparoscopic liver resection program's quality and extend indications.
在过去几十年中,腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)已在肝胆外科医生群体中得到广泛认可。迄今为止,关于发展中国家LLR项目的数据很少。本研究旨在评估摩洛哥一个外科单元中LLR的可行性和安全性。
从2010年6月至2013年2月,从一个前瞻性“肝切除术”数据库中识别出接受LLR的患者并纳入本研究。使用超声刀和双极电凝进行实质离断,未使用术中超声或系统性蒂部阻断。根据路易斯维尔声明,LLR难度分为3类(I - III)。分析了人口统计学信息、肝脏病变信息、手术细节、病理切缘以及根据Clavien - Dindo(C - D)分类的术后1个月发病率。
在104例行肝切除术的患者中,13例(12.5%)接受了LLR。其中女性7例,男性6例,平均年龄57.5±17岁。3例LLR用于良性病变,10例(77%)用于恶性病变:7例为肝细胞癌,3例为同步直肠肝转移。12例(92%)患者的病变为单发,中位大小为50mm(15mm - 150mm)。肝转移患者接受了腹腔镜直肠和肝脏联合切除术。12例(92%)患者采用纯腹腔镜方法,1例采用混合方法。LLR难度分别为I类、II类和III类的患者有3例(23%)、6例(46%)和4例(31%)。转为开腹肝切除术的比例为15%。平均失血量为395ml±270ml,未进行肝蒂阻断或术中输血。所有切除标本切缘均无肿瘤。死亡率为零,4例(30%)患者发生并发症:腹水(C - D 2级)和联合切除术中盆腔感染(C - D 3b级)。中位住院时间为6天。
在我们的情况下,对于选定的患者,腹腔镜肝切除术是安全的,因为未记录到手术死亡、输血需求或姑息性切除,且肝脏相关发病率较低。术中肝脏超声检查能力对于提高腹腔镜肝切除术项目的质量和扩大适应证是必不可少的。