Suppr超能文献

纯腹腔镜下恶性肝肿瘤切除术:解剖性切除与非解剖性切除

Pure Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Malignant Liver Tumor: Anatomic Resection Versus Nonanatomic Resection.

作者信息

Chen Ya-Xi, Xiu Dian-Rong, Yuan Chun-Hui, Jiang Bin, Ma Zhao-Lai

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Jan 5;129(1):39-47. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.172567.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been considered to be safe and feasible. However, few studies focused on the comparison between the anatomic and nonanatomic LLR. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative factors and outcomes of the anatomic and nonanatomic LLR, especially the area of liver parenchymal transection and blood loss per unit area.

METHODS

In this study, surgical and oncological data of patients underwent pure LLR procedures for malignant liver tumor were prospectively collected. Blood loss per unit area of liver parenchymal transection was measured and considered as an important parameter. All procedures were conducted by a single surgeon.

RESULTS

During nearly 5 years, 84 patients with malignant liver tumor received a pure LLR procedure were included. Among them, 34 patients received anatomic LLR and 50 received nonanatomic LLR, respectively. Patients of the two groups were similar in terms of demographic features and tumor characteristics, despite the tumor size was significantly larger in the anatomic LLR group than that in the nonanatomic LLR group (4.77 ± 2.57 vs. 2.87 ± 2.10 cm, P = 0.001). Patients who underwent anatomic resection had longer operation time (364.09 ± 131.22 vs. 252.00 ± 135.21 min, P < 0.001) but less blood loss per unit area (7.85 ± 7.17 vs. 14.17 ± 10.43 ml/cm 2 , P = 0.018). Nonanatomic LLR was associated with more blood loss when the area of parenchymal transection was equal to the anatomic LLR. No mortality occurred during the hospital stay and 30 days after the operation. Moreover, there was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications. The disease-free and overall survival rates showed no significant differences between the anatomic LLR and nonanatomic LLR groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both anatomic and nonanatomic pure LLR are safe and feasible. Measuring the area of parenchymal transection is a simple and effective method to estimate the outcomes of the liver resection surgery. Blood loss per unit area is an important parameter which is comparable between the anatomic LLR and nonanatomic LLR groups.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)已被认为是安全可行的。然而,很少有研究关注解剖性与非解剖性LLR之间的比较。因此,本研究的目的是比较解剖性与非解剖性LLR的围手术期因素及结果,尤其是肝实质离断面面积和单位面积失血量。

方法

本研究前瞻性收集了接受单纯LLR治疗恶性肝肿瘤患者的手术及肿瘤学数据。测量肝实质离断面的单位面积失血量,并将其视为一个重要参数。所有手术均由一名外科医生完成。

结果

在近5年中,纳入了84例接受单纯LLR治疗的恶性肝肿瘤患者。其中,分别有34例患者接受了解剖性LLR,50例接受了非解剖性LLR。两组患者在人口统计学特征和肿瘤特征方面相似,尽管解剖性LLR组的肿瘤大小显著大于非解剖性LLR组(4.77±2.57 vs. 2.87±2.10 cm,P = 0.001)。接受解剖性切除的患者手术时间更长(364.09±131.22 vs. 252.00±135.21分钟,P < 0.001),但单位面积失血量更少(7.85±7.17 vs. 14.17±10.43 ml/cm²,P = 0.018)。当实质离断面面积与解剖性LLR相等时,非解剖性LLR的失血量更多。住院期间及术后30天内无死亡发生。此外,术后并发症发生率无差异。解剖性LLR组与非解剖性LLR组的无病生存率和总生存率无显著差异。

结论

解剖性和非解剖性单纯LLR均安全可行。测量实质离断面面积是评估肝切除手术结果的一种简单有效的方法。单位面积失血量是解剖性LLR组和非解剖性LLR组之间具有可比性的一个重要参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3f2/4797541/5fbe7c5abfea/CMJ-129-39-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验