• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无辅助戒烟尝试及成功的州级相关因素

State-Level Correlates of Unassisted Quit Attempts and Success.

作者信息

Williams Mary B, Beebe Laura A, Neas Barbara R

出版信息

J Okla State Med Assoc. 2015 Nov;108(11):455-62.

PMID:26817062
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the majority of smokers attempting to quit do so without assistance, research in the area of unassisted quit behaviors is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate whether population-level policies and programs, such as smoke-free air policies and tobacco control programs, contribute to unassisted quit attempts and cessation.

METHODS

The current study used the 2003 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS) special Cessation Supplement (CS) to estimate unassisted quit attempt and success rates by state. Linear regression was used to examine whether state-level unassisted quit attempt and success rates were related to state-level policies and social norms. State-level factors investigated were tobacco control program funding, tobacco taxes, smoke-free air policies, state anti-smoking sentiment and recent change in smoking prevalence.

RESULTS

Consistent with previous studies, this study found the majority of smokers who attempted to quit did so without assistance. This study also found unassisted quit attempt rates were higher than assisted attempt rates in every state and DC. Additionally, unassisted quit success rates were higher than assisted quit success rates in most states; however, some states had higher assisted quit success rates. State-level factors associated with unassisted quit attempt rates included anti-smoking sentiment and tobacco taxes; however, no significant relationships were uncovered between unassisted quit success rates and state-level factors.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that state-level factors may be more important in motivating smokers to attempt quitting, and other individual factors or unmeasured state factors may be related to quit success.

摘要

背景

尽管大多数试图戒烟的吸烟者是在没有帮助的情况下进行的,但关于无辅助戒烟行为领域的研究有限。本研究的目的是调查诸如无烟空气政策和烟草控制项目等人群层面的政策和项目是否有助于无辅助戒烟尝试及戒烟成功。

方法

本研究使用了《当前人口调查》(TUS-CPS)2003年烟草使用补充调查的特别戒烟补充调查(CS)来估计各州的无辅助戒烟尝试率和成功率。采用线性回归来检验州层面的无辅助戒烟尝试率和成功率是否与州层面的政策及社会规范相关。所调查的州层面因素包括烟草控制项目资金、烟草税、无烟空气政策、州反吸烟情绪以及近期吸烟流行率的变化。

结果

与之前的研究一致,本研究发现大多数试图戒烟的吸烟者是在没有帮助的情况下进行的。本研究还发现,在每个州及华盛顿特区,无辅助戒烟尝试率均高于有辅助戒烟尝试率。此外,在大多数州,无辅助戒烟成功率高于有辅助戒烟成功率;然而,一些州的有辅助戒烟成功率更高。与无辅助戒烟尝试率相关的州层面因素包括反吸烟情绪和烟草税;然而,未发现无辅助戒烟成功率与州层面因素之间存在显著关系。

结论

这些结果表明,州层面因素在促使吸烟者尝试戒烟方面可能更为重要,而其他个体因素或未测量的州层面因素可能与戒烟成功有关。

相似文献

1
State-Level Correlates of Unassisted Quit Attempts and Success.无辅助戒烟尝试及成功的州级相关因素
J Okla State Med Assoc. 2015 Nov;108(11):455-62.
2
Tobacco Advertising, Anti-Tobacco Information Exposure, Environmental Smoking Restrictions, and Unassisted Smoking Cessation Among Chinese Male Smokers: A Population-Based Study.中国男性吸烟者中的烟草广告、反烟草信息暴露、环境无烟限制和非协助戒烟:一项基于人群的研究。
Am J Mens Health. 2019 May-Jun;13(3):1557988319856152. doi: 10.1177/1557988319856152.
3
Unassisted Quitting and Smoking Cessation Methods Used in the United States: Analyses of 2010-2011 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey Data.美国未辅助戒烟和戒烟方法:对 2010-2011 年烟草使用情况补充调查与当前人口调查数据的分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Dec 13;20(1):30-39. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw273.
4
State Tobacco Excise Taxation, Comprehensive Smoke-free Air Laws, and Tobacco Control Appropriations as Predictors of Smoking Cessation Success in the United States.国家烟草税、全面无烟空气法和烟草控制拨款对美国戒烟成功的预测。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020 Sep/Oct;26(5):E1-E4. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000865.
5
Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Access to Care and Quitting Smoking With and Without Assistance.社会经济地位与获得医疗保健的机会以及有无帮助戒烟之间的关联。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Dec 13;20(1):40-49. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx059.
6
The relationship of smoking cessation to sociodemographic characteristics, smoking intensity, and tobacco control policies.戒烟与社会人口学特征、吸烟强度及烟草控制政策的关系。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2005 Jun;7(3):387-96. doi: 10.1080/14622200500125443.
7
Real-world unassisted quit success and related contextual factors: a population-based study of Chinese male smokers.真实世界中未辅助戒烟成功及相关背景因素:一项基于人群的中国男性吸烟者研究。
Tob Control. 2021 Sep;30(5):498-504. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055594. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
8
What do we know about unassisted smoking cessation in Australia? A systematic review, 2005-2012.我们对澳大利亚的自主戒烟了解多少?一项 2005-2012 年的系统评价。
Tob Control. 2015 Jan;24(1):18-27. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051019. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
9
Smoke-free air laws and quit attempts: Evidence for a moderating role of spontaneous self-affirmation.无烟空气法与戒烟尝试:关于自发自我肯定的调节作用的证据
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Sep;141:46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.015. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
10
Prevalence of unassisted quit attempts in population-based studies: a systematic review of the literature.基于人群的研究中未辅助戒烟尝试的流行率:文献系统评价。
Addict Behav. 2014 Mar;39(3):512-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.036. Epub 2013 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Is unassisted smoking cessation choice and success associated with high mental stress? Evidence from six cities in China.自主戒烟的选择和成功率与高精神压力有关吗?来自中国六个城市的证据。
Tob Induc Dis. 2024 Oct 14;22. doi: 10.18332/tid/193606. eCollection 2024.
2
Factors associated with abstinence after a recent smoking cessation attempt across 28 European Union member states.28个欧盟成员国近期戒烟尝试后与戒烟相关的因素。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2020 Jan 25;7:5. doi: 10.18332/tpc/132123. eCollection 2021.
3
Tobacco Advertising, Anti-Tobacco Information Exposure, Environmental Smoking Restrictions, and Unassisted Smoking Cessation Among Chinese Male Smokers: A Population-Based Study.
中国男性吸烟者中的烟草广告、反烟草信息暴露、环境无烟限制和非协助戒烟:一项基于人群的研究。
Am J Mens Health. 2019 May-Jun;13(3):1557988319856152. doi: 10.1177/1557988319856152.