• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[辅助放疗在早期IB1期宫颈癌中的预后意义]

[PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY IN EARLY IB1 STAGE CERVICAL CANCER].

作者信息

Ismail E, Kornovski Y

出版信息

Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2015;54(6):16-23.

PMID:26817258
Abstract

The cervical cancer is one of the most common malignancies. Worldwide 500,000 women a year become ill from cervical cancer. The aim of the study was to establish the role of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with IB1 cervical cancer in terms of disease free survival. Between 2002-2012, 132 patients diagnosed as IB1 stage according to FIGO criteria were enrolled in the study. Depending on the administered therapy the patients were divided into two groups--Group 1-93 patients were treated surgically and with adjuvant radiotherapy and Group 2--39 patients were treated surgically without adjuvant radiotherapy Surgery was radical hysterectomy class III and pelvic or paraaortic lymph node dissection(in cases of bulky paraaortic nodes), and adjuvant RT-telegamma therapy(TGT) in dose 52 Gy. The frequency of recurrence in a Group I (surgery and TGT) is 9.7%. Tree and five years disease free survival (DFS) is 88%. The frequency of recurrence in a Group 2 (surgery without TGT) is 25.6%. Tree and five years DFS respectively are 70% and 65%. In an analysis of oncological results establish that adjuvant TGT after surgery significantly increases DFS. On the other hand the addition of adjuvant TGT increases the patients morbidity Therefore should determine which are the risk factors for the occurrence of relapses and select group of patients who would benefit from adjuvant TGT and the risk of complications in them would be justified.

摘要

宫颈癌是最常见的恶性肿瘤之一。全球每年有50万女性罹患宫颈癌。本研究的目的是确定辅助放疗在IB1期宫颈癌患者无病生存方面的作用。2002年至2012年期间,132例根据国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)标准诊断为IB1期的患者纳入本研究。根据所接受的治疗,患者被分为两组——第1组,93例患者接受手术及辅助放疗;第2组,39例患者仅接受手术未行辅助放疗。手术为III级根治性子宫切除术及盆腔或腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术(腹主动脉旁淋巴结肿大时),辅助放疗采用远距离γ射线治疗(TGT),剂量为52 Gy。第1组(手术加TGT)的复发率为9.7%。3年和5年无病生存率(DFS)为88%。第2组(手术未加TGT)的复发率为25.6%。3年和5年DFS分别为70%和65%。在肿瘤学结果分析中发现,术后辅助TGT显著提高DFS。另一方面,辅助TGT的加入增加了患者的发病率。因此,应确定哪些是复发的危险因素,并选择能从辅助TGT中获益且并发症风险合理的患者群体。

相似文献

1
[PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY IN EARLY IB1 STAGE CERVICAL CANCER].[辅助放疗在早期IB1期宫颈癌中的预后意义]
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2015;54(6):16-23.
2
[Therapeutic outcomes in patients with cervical cancer FIGO stage IB1].[国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)1B1期宫颈癌患者的治疗结果]
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2012;51(3):32-4.
3
[Oncological outcomes of combined therapy in patients with cervical carcinoma FIGO stage IIB].[FIGO IIB期宫颈癌患者联合治疗的肿瘤学结局]
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2012;51(4):24-9.
4
[Treatment of cervical carcinoma IB2 stage].[宫颈癌IB2期的治疗]
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2012;51(4):18-23.
5
[Oncologucal results after surgical and radio-surgical treatment in patients with cervical cancer stage Ib1].[Ib1期宫颈癌患者手术及放射外科治疗后的肿瘤学结果]
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2013;52 Suppl 1:31-6.
6
Early stage cervical cancer: adjuvant treatment in negative lymph node cases.早期宫颈癌:淋巴结阴性病例的辅助治疗
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Oct;107(1 Suppl 1):S170-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.026. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
7
Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB2 cervical cancer.针对IB2期宫颈癌的根治性子宫切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术。
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 May;93(2):429-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.01.038.
8
Radical hysterectomy compared with primary radiation for treatment of stage IB1 cervix cancer.根治性子宫切除术与单纯放疗治疗ⅠB1 期宫颈癌的比较。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb;37(1):30-4. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31826103d0.
9
[Our 3-years experience in surgical management of cervical cancer].[我们在宫颈癌手术治疗方面的3年经验]
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2006;45(7):41-6.
10
[PROGNOSTIC GROUPS FOR RELAPSE IN STAGE IB1 CERVICAL CANCER].
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2015;54(6):28-34.