Lattouf Ihab, Lu Chuan, Pixton Sarah, Reid Shannon, Condous George
Early Pregnancy, Acute Gynaecology & Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, Nepean Hospital, University of Sydney, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
Department of Computer Science, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Feb;56(1):107-12. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12434.
The primary aim was to assess whether ectopic pregnancies (EPs) visualised on primary scan behave differently to EPs initially characterised as pregnancies of unknown location (PUL). The secondary aim was to assess whether the EP group is more likely to have surgical management compared to the PUL ectopic pregnancy group.
Prospective observational study. Consecutive first trimester women presenting from November 2006 to March 2012 underwent transvaginal ultrasound (TVS). Women diagnosed with an EP on TVS were divided into two groups: visualised EPs noted on the first TVS, and PULs which subsequently developed into EPs. Twenty-five historical, clinical, biochemical and ultrasonographic variables were collected. Different management strategies (expectant, medical, surgical) once an EP was confirmed on TVS were recorded. Univariate analysis was performed to compare differences between the two groups as well as rates for the three final management strategies.
A total of 3341 consecutive women underwent TVS. On initial scan, 86.2% were classified as intrauterine pregnancy, 8.8% as PUL and 5.0% as EP (145 tubal/23 nontubal EPs). There were 194 tubal EPs in final analysis: 49 of 194 (25.3%) initially classified as PUL and 145 of 194 (74.7%) diagnosed as EP at primary TVS. When comparing the EP to the PUL EP group, the pain scores were 3.34 versus 1.91 (P-value < 0.001), the mean sac diameters were 35.2 versus 18.5 mm (P-value = 0.0327), and the volume of the EP masses were 8.21E+04 versus 1.40E+04 (P-value = 0.0341). Cumulative surgical intervention rate was significantly higher in EP compared to PUL EP group (P-value = 0.036).
EPs seen at the first ultrasound scan appear to be more symptomatic, larger in diameter and volume compared to EPs which started as PULs. Cumulative surgical intervention rate was noted to be higher in this group with EP seen on ultrasound at the outset.
主要目的是评估初次超声检查时可视化的异位妊娠(EP)与最初被归类为妊娠位置不明(PUL)的EP表现是否不同。次要目的是评估与PUL异位妊娠组相比,EP组是否更有可能接受手术治疗。
前瞻性观察研究。对2006年11月至2012年3月期间连续就诊的孕早期妇女进行经阴道超声检查(TVS)。经TVS诊断为EP的妇女分为两组:初次TVS时发现的可视化EP,以及随后发展为EP的PUL。收集了25项病史、临床、生化和超声变量。记录TVS确诊为EP后不同的治疗策略(期待治疗、药物治疗、手术治疗)。进行单因素分析以比较两组之间的差异以及三种最终治疗策略的发生率。
共有3341名连续妇女接受了TVS检查。初次扫描时,86.2%被分类为宫内妊娠,8.8%为PUL,5.0%为EP(145例输卵管妊娠/23例非输卵管妊娠)。最终分析中有194例输卵管妊娠:194例中的49例(25.3%)最初被分类为PUL,194例中的145例(74.7%)在初次TVS时被诊断为EP。将EP组与PUL EP组进行比较时,疼痛评分分别为3.34和1.91(P值<0.001),平均孕囊直径分别为35.2和18.5mm(P值=0.0327),EP肿块体积分别为8.21E+04和1.40E+04(P值=0.0341)。与PUL EP组相比,EP组的累积手术干预率显著更高(P值=0.036)。
与最初为PUL的EP相比,初次超声检查时发现的EP似乎症状更明显,直径和体积更大。该组最初超声检查时发现的EP的累积手术干预率更高。