Suppr超能文献

基于MRI确定腰椎退变性侧凸患者腰椎外侧椎间融合术的凸侧或凹侧手术入路:一项回顾性影像学对比分析

MRI-based determination of convex or concave surgical approach for lateral lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative scoliosis: a retrospective radiographic comparative analysis.

作者信息

Shin Myung-Hoon, Ryu Kyeong-Sik

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Incheon St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, South Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea -

出版信息

J Neurosurg Sci. 2017 Dec;61(6):579-588. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.16.03498-6. Epub 2016 Jan 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We determined the optimal approach to perform lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) to treat lumbar degenerative scoliosis (LDS) by comparing the safe zone and psoas muscle on the concave and convex sides.

METHODS

Patients without scoliosis (N.=52) and those with levoscoliosis (N.=55) and dextroscoliosis (N.=53) were included. Vertebral anteroposterior diameter, overlap between the retroperitoneal vessels and the anterior edge of the vertebra, and overlap between the ventral nerve roots and the posterior edge of the vertebra were measured, and safe zones were calculated. The cross-sectional area (CSA) and fatty infiltration (FI) rate of the bilateral psoas muscle were measured, and the convex and concave sides were compared.

RESULTS

The ventral overlap on the convex side decreased at the L3-4 and L4-5 levels in the levoscoliosis group (P=0.05 and P=0.01, respectively) and at the L2-3 and L3-4 levels in the dextroscoliosis group (P=0.01 and P=0.03, respectively). The convex side at the L3-4 and L4-5 levels presented a greater safe zone in the levoscoliosis group (76.11% vs. 74.00% at L3-4, P=0.02; 69.37% vs. 63.16% at L4-5, P=0.00). The convex side at the L2-3, L3-4, and L4-5 levels in the dextroscoliosis group showed greater safe zones compared to those in the group without scoliosis (77.78% vs. 74.40% at L2-3, P=0.02; 72.15% vs. 69.87% at L3-4, P=0.03; and 58.45% vs. 54.39% L4-5 level, P=0.01). CSA of the psoas muscle on the concave side was significantly higher at the L2-3 and L3-4 levels (P=0.02 and 0.01, respectively). The psoas muscle on the concave side was significantly thicker (P=0.00 at all levels) with a higher FI rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The convex retroperitoneal vessels were positioned more anteriorly, whereas the ventral nerve roots lacked significant positional alterations, increasing the convex safe zone and providing optimal disc space access and less psoas muscle injury.

摘要

背景

通过比较腰椎退变侧凸(LDS)凹侧和凸侧的安全区域及腰大肌情况,我们确定了进行腰椎侧方椎间融合术(LLIF)治疗LDS的最佳方法。

方法

纳入无脊柱侧凸患者(n = 52)、左旋脊柱侧凸患者(n = 55)和右旋脊柱侧凸患者(n = 53)。测量椎体前后径、腹膜后血管与椎体前缘的重叠情况以及腹侧神经根与椎体后缘的重叠情况,并计算安全区域。测量双侧腰大肌的横截面积(CSA)和脂肪浸润(FI)率,并比较凸侧和凹侧。

结果

左旋脊柱侧凸组在L3 - 4和L4 - 5水平凸侧的腹侧重叠减少(分别为P = 0.05和P = 0.01),右旋脊柱侧凸组在L2 - 3和L3 - 4水平凸侧的腹侧重叠减少(分别为P = 0.01和P = 0.03)。左旋脊柱侧凸组在L3 - 4和L4 - 5水平凸侧的安全区域更大(L3 - 4水平,76.11%对74.00%,P = 0.02;L4 - 5水平,69.37%对63.16%,P = 0.00)。右旋脊柱侧凸组在L2 - 3、L3 - 4和L4 - 5水平凸侧的安全区域比无脊柱侧凸组更大(L2 - 3水平,77.78%对74.40%,P = 0.02;L3 - 4水平,72.15%对69.87%,P = 0.03;L4 - 5水平,58.45%对54.39%,P = 0.01)。凹侧腰大肌在L2 - 3和L3 - 4水平的CSA显著更高(分别为P = 0.02和P = 0.01)。凹侧腰大肌明显更厚(所有水平P = 0.00)且FI率更高。

结论

凸侧腹膜后血管位置更靠前,而腹侧神经根位置无明显改变,增加了凸侧安全区域,提供了最佳的椎间盘间隙入路且减少了腰大肌损伤。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验