• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于正常和畸形脊柱微创外侧入路的腹侧神经根和腹膜后血管的形态计量学分析。

Morphometric analysis of the ventral nerve roots and retroperitoneal vessels with respect to the minimally invasive lateral approach in normal and deformed spines.

作者信息

Regev Gilad J, Chen Lina, Dhawan Mallika, Lee Yu Po, Garfin Steven R, Kim Choll W

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 20;34(12):1330-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a029e1.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a029e1
PMID:19455010
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A morphometric analysis, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of the lumbar spine.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the anatomic position of the ventral root and the retroperitoneal vessels in relation to the vertebral body in normally aligned and deformed spines.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The lateral approach to the lumbar spine is a relatively new method for performing interbody fusions. In contrast to the standard open anterior approach with direct vision of the operative field, the lateral approach uses expandable retractors that are positioned under fluoroscopic guidance. Risks of this technique include injury to the exiting nerve root and retroperitoneal vessels.

METHODS

One hundred lumbar spine MRI studies were reviewed from patients treated for various spinal pathologies. The measured intervertebral segments were divided into 3 groups: group 1 (n = 247), normally aligned vertebrae and disc spaces; group 2 (n = 18), degenerative spondylolisthetic segments; and group 3 (n = 19), segments from the apex of degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Axial MR images were used to measure: the vertebral endplate anterior-posterior (AP) diameter, the overlap between the ventral root and the posterior margin of the vertebra, and the overlap between the retroperitoneal large vessels and the anterior edge of the vertebra.

RESULTS

The overlap between the adjacent neuro-vascular structures and the vertebral body endplate gradually increased from L1-L2 to L4-L5. The maximal overlap, at the L4-L5 level reached 87% resulting in a relatively narrow corridor for performing the operative procedure. Alteration in the anatomic location of the nerve root and the retroperitoneal vessels, in Group 3 (scoliosis) further decreased the safe corridor.

CONCLUSION

The safe corridor for performing the discectomy and inserting the intervertebral cage narrows from L1-L2 to the L4-L5 level. This corridor is further narrowed with rotatory deformity of the spine. Using the preoperative MRI to assess the relative position of the adjacent neuro-vascular structures in relation to the lower vertebra's endplate at each level is recommended.

摘要

研究设计

一项形态测量分析,采用腰椎的磁共振成像(MRI)研究。

目的

确定在正常排列和变形脊柱中,腹侧神经根和腹膜后血管相对于椎体的解剖位置。

背景数据总结

腰椎侧方入路是一种相对较新的椎间融合术式。与可直接观察术野的标准开放前路入路不同,侧方入路使用在透视引导下定位的可扩张牵开器。该技术的风险包括对穿出神经根和腹膜后血管的损伤。

方法

回顾了100例因各种脊柱病变接受治疗患者的腰椎MRI研究。所测量的椎间节段分为3组:第1组(n = 247),椎体和椎间盘间隙正常排列;第2组(n = 18),退变性椎体滑脱节段;第3组(n = 19),退变性腰椎侧弯顶点的节段。利用轴向MR图像测量:椎体终板前后径、腹侧神经根与椎体后缘的重叠情况以及腹膜后大血管与椎体前缘的重叠情况。

结果

相邻神经血管结构与椎体终板之间的重叠从L1-L2至L4-L5逐渐增加。在L4-L5水平重叠最大,达到87%,这导致手术操作的通道相对狭窄。第3组(脊柱侧弯)中神经根和腹膜后血管的解剖位置改变进一步缩小了安全通道。

结论

进行椎间盘切除术和插入椎间融合器的安全通道从L1-L2至L4-L5水平逐渐变窄。脊柱旋转畸形会使该通道进一步变窄。建议术前使用MRI评估每个节段相邻神经血管结构相对于下位椎体终板的相对位置。

相似文献

1
Morphometric analysis of the ventral nerve roots and retroperitoneal vessels with respect to the minimally invasive lateral approach in normal and deformed spines.关于正常和畸形脊柱微创外侧入路的腹侧神经根和腹膜后血管的形态计量学分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 20;34(12):1330-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a029e1.
2
Safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: a morphometric study.使用微创侧腹膜后经腰大肌入路的安全工作区:一项形态学研究
Surg Radiol Anat. 2011 Oct;33(8):665-71. doi: 10.1007/s00276-011-0798-6. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
3
Anatomic mapping of lumbar nerve roots during a direct lateral transpsoas approach to the spine: a cadaveric study.直接经腰大肌外侧入路脊柱手术中腰椎神经根的解剖定位:尸体研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 May 15;36(11):E687-91. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ec5911.
4
[Injury to major blood vessels in anterior thoracic and lumbar spinal surgery].[胸腰椎前路手术中主要血管损伤]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006 Apr;73(2):92-8.
5
Percutaneous axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) of the L5-S1 segment: initial clinical and radiographic experience.L5-S1节段经皮轴向腰椎椎间融合术(AxiaLIF):初步临床及影像学经验
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2008 Aug;51(4):225-30. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1080915.
6
Minimally invasive multilevel percutaneous correction and fusion for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: a technique and feasibility study.成人腰椎退行性脊柱侧凸的微创多节段经皮矫正与融合:一项技术与可行性研究
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Oct;21(7):459-67. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318167b06b.
7
An open, minimally invasive approach to the lumbar spine.一种针对腰椎的开放、微创方法。
Am Surg. 1999 Jan;65(1):61-8.
8
Preliminary application of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion with prospace and facet fusion using local autograft.采用局部自体移植的单节段后路腰椎椎间融合联合Prospace和小关节融合的初步应用
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Nov;21(11):1155-9.
9
[Anatomical background of low back pain: variability and degeneration of the lumbar spinal canal and intervertebral disc].[腰痛的解剖学背景:腰椎管和椎间盘的变异性与退变]
Schmerz. 2001 Dec;15(6):418-24. doi: 10.1007/s004820100026.
10
The relationship of intrapsoas nerves during a transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine: anatomic study.经腰大肌入路至腰椎时腰大肌内神经的关系:解剖学研究
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Jun;23(4):223-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181a9d540.

引用本文的文献

1
How to insert a more suitable ATP-OLIF51 cage?: A radiological study compared L5/S1 endplate to L4/5 endplate.如何植入更合适的ATP-OLIF51椎间融合器?一项影像学研究对比了L5/S1终板与L4/5终板。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 25;104(30):e43561. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043561.
2
Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion.腰大肌外侧椎间融合术
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Feb 24;19(S1):S7-S18. doi: 10.14444/8711.
3
L4-L5 anatomy classification system for lateral lumbar interbody fusion.L4-L5 解剖学分类系统用于侧路腰椎间融合术。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Sep 4;47(1):529. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02740-2.
4
Sequential Depth Stimulation Within the Psoas Offers No Benefit for Localization of the Lumbar Plexus During Lateral Lumbar Fusion Surgery.腰大肌内的序贯深度刺激对腰椎外侧融合手术中腰丛的定位无益处。
Global Spine J. 2025 Jan;15(1):121-126. doi: 10.1177/21925682241226951. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
5
Vascular injury risk stratification for lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) at L4-L5: a morphometric study using magnetic resonance imaging.L4-L5 节段侧方腰椎椎间融合术(LLIF)的血管损伤风险分层:一项使用磁共振成像的形态学研究
J Spine Surg. 2023 Dec 25;9(4):380-389. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-94. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
6
Lateral interbody fusion without intraoperative neuromonitoring in addition to posterior instrumented fusion in geriatric patients: A single center consecutive series of 108 surgeries.老年患者在进行后路器械融合术之外,不进行术中神经监测的外侧椎间融合术:单中心连续108例手术系列报道
Brain Spine. 2023 Jul 11;3:101782. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.101782. eCollection 2023.
7
Postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing MIS-TLIF versus LLIF for adjacent segment disease.微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)与经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(LLIF)治疗相邻节段疾病的术后临床疗效。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Jul;165(7):1907-1914. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05629-z. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
8
Anatomical Analysis of the Gonadal Veins and Spine in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.腰椎侧方椎间融合术中性腺静脉与脊柱的解剖学分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 21;12(8):3041. doi: 10.3390/jcm12083041.
9
A retrospective review of single-position prone lateral lumbar interbody fusion cases: early learning curve and perioperative outcomes.回顾性分析单体位俯卧位侧方腰椎椎间融合术病例:早期学习曲线和围手术期结果。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Jun;32(6):1992-2002. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07689-2. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
10
Morphometric Analysis of the Ureter with Respect to Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography.使用对比增强计算机断层扫描对输尿管进行关于腰椎外侧椎间融合的形态计量学分析。
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2023 Mar;66(2):155-161. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2022.0079. Epub 2022 Aug 17.