• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多特质-多方法矩阵中的方法因素:乘法而非加法?

Methods Factors In Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices : Multiplicative Rather Than Additive?

作者信息

Campbell D T, O'Connell E J

出版信息

Multivariate Behav Res. 1967 Oct 1;2(4):409-26. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0204_1.

DOI:10.1207/s15327906mbr0204_1
PMID:26824852
Abstract

When traits are measured by the same method (or at the same time) the intertrait correlations are higher than when the intertrait correlation is across methods. An empirical investigation of the nature of such method factors is reported, in which the method factors seem to operate in a multiplicative rather than additive way, or in which larger method loadings are associated with larger trait loadings. An implicit-theory-of-personality explanation is offered for the case of ratings as methods. An attenuation model has more general applicability to the oases illustrated. The possibility is raised that the finding, if confirmed in other domains, demonstrates a fundamental innappropriateness of factor analysis for the componential analysis of indi6dual differences data.

摘要

当特质通过相同方法(或在同一时间)进行测量时,特质间的相关性高于跨方法的特质间相关性。本文报告了对这类方法因素性质的实证研究,其中方法因素似乎以乘法而非加法的方式起作用,或者较大的方法载荷与较大的特质载荷相关联。针对以评级作为方法的情况,提供了一种人格内隐理论解释。衰减模型对所说明的情况具有更广泛的适用性。文中提出一种可能性,即如果该发现在其他领域得到证实,那么它表明因素分析对于个体差异数据的成分分析存在根本的不适用性。

相似文献

1
Methods Factors In Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices : Multiplicative Rather Than Additive?多特质-多方法矩阵中的方法因素:乘法而非加法?
Multivariate Behav Res. 1967 Oct 1;2(4):409-26. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0204_1.
2
Analysis of Multitrait-Multioccasion Data: Additive versus Multiplicative Models.多性状多场合数据的分析:加法模型与乘法模型
Multivariate Behav Res. 2002 Jan 1;37(1):59-87. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3701_03.
3
Large-scale investigation of the role of trait activation theory for understanding assessment center convergent and discriminant validity.特质激活理论在理解评估中心的聚合效度和区分效度方面作用的大规模调查。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Mar;91(2):247-58. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.247.
4
Distinguishing Trait And Method Variance In Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices: A Reply To Golding.多特质-多方法矩阵中特质方差与方法方差的区分:对戈尔丁的回应
Multivariate Behav Res. 1977 Jan 1;12(1):99-110. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1201_8.
5
Modeling Common Traits and Method Effects in Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis.多特质-多方法分析中常见特质与方法效应的建模
Multivariate Behav Res. 2010 Jan 29;45(1):45-72. doi: 10.1080/00273170903504729.
6
MULTIMETHOD FACTOR ANALYSIS: A REFORMULATION.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1975 Jul 1;10(3):259-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1003_1.
7
Linear Confirmatory Factor Models to Evaluate Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices: The Effects of Number of Indicators and Correlation Among Methods.用于评估多特质-多方法矩阵的线性验证性因子模型:指标数量和方法间相关性的影响
Multivariate Behav Res. 2000 Oct 1;35(4):469-99. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3504_03.
8
ANALYSIS OF MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRICES: A TWO STEP PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS PROCEDURE.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1974 Oct 1;9(4):479-96. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0904_7.
9
Separating method factors and higher order traits of the Big Five: a meta-analytic multitrait-multimethod approach. 分离大五人格的方法因素和高阶特质:一种元分析的多特质-多方法方法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Feb;102(2):408-26. doi: 10.1037/a0025559. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
10
A Review And Critique Of Analyses Of Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices.多特质-多方法矩阵分析的回顾与批判
Multivariate Behav Res. 1977 Oct 1;12(4):447-78. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1204_3.

引用本文的文献

1
Construct identification in the neuropsychological battery: What are we measuring?神经心理学测验中的结构识别:我们在测量什么?
Neuropsychology. 2023 May;37(4):351-372. doi: 10.1037/neu0000832. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
2
A Reformulated Correlated Trait-Correlated Method Model for Multitrait-Multimethod Data Effectively Increases Convergence and Admissibility Rates.一种用于多特质-多方法数据的重新构建的相关特质-相关方法模型有效提高了收敛率和可接受率。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Dec;77(6):1048-1063. doi: 10.1177/0013164416677144. Epub 2016 Nov 13.
3
Convergence, Admissibility, and Fit of Alternative Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models for MTMM Data.
多特质多方法数据的替代验证性因素分析模型的收敛性、可接受性和拟合度
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Jun;76(3):487-507. doi: 10.1177/0013164415601884. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
4
Validating the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ-II) Using Set-ESEM: Identifying Psychosocial Risk Factors in a Sample of School Principals.使用设定的扩展结构方程模型(Set-ESEM)验证哥本哈根心理社会问卷(COPSOQ-II):识别中小学校长样本中的心理社会风险因素。
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 30;9:584. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00584. eCollection 2018.
5
Methodological consequences of situation specificity: biases in assessments.情境特异性的方法学后果:评估中的偏差
Front Psychol. 2011 Feb 17;2:18. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00018. eCollection 2011.
6
Construct validity: advances in theory and methodology.结构效度:理论与方法的进展
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009;5:1-25. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153639.