Naberhuis Jane, Wetzel Christine, Tappenden Kelly A
Division of Nutritional Sciences (Drs Naberhuis and Tappenden) and Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition (Dr Tappenden), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana; and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois (Ms Wetzel).
Adv Neonatal Care. 2016 Jun;16(3):239-44. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000250.
Preterm infants are at increased risk of developing feeding intolerance and necrotizing enterocolitis. Comprehensive, targeted nursing assessments can evaluate the risk for and identify early signs of these conditions in an effort to prevent their destructive sequela.
While the long-term goal is to develop a validated risk-scoring tool for the prediction of feeding intolerance and necrotizing enterocolitis, the objective of the preliminary phase presented here is to assess the ease of use and nurses' attitudes toward a novel feeding intolerance and necrotizing enterocolitis risk-scoring tool.
A novel risk-scoring nursing tool was implemented in a University of Illinois-affiliated 48-bed level III neonatal intensive care unit. Data were collected from the electronic medical record of all preterm infants with parental consent during the initial 6-month study period. Scoring accuracy (accuracy of selection of risk factors based on electronic medical record data), ease of use, and nurses' attitudes toward the tool were assessed at the study site and by evaluators at a national neonatal nursing conference.
Fourteen nurses scored 166 tools on the 63 enrolled infants. Sixteen tools (9.6%) contained errors. Mean study site tool ease of use was 8.1 (SD: 2.2) on a 10-point scale. Ninety percent of conference evaluators agreed/strongly agreed that the tool addressed important knowledge gaps.
The tool is easy to use and valued by nurses. Following validation, widespread implementation is expected to be a clinically feasible means to improve infant clinical outcomes for minimal time and financial cost.
Tool validation and refinement based on nursing feedback will improve its broad applicability and predictive utility.
早产儿发生喂养不耐受和坏死性小肠结肠炎的风险增加。全面、有针对性的护理评估可以评估这些情况的风险,并识别其早期迹象,以预防其破坏性后果。
虽然长期目标是开发一种经过验证的风险评分工具,用于预测喂养不耐受和坏死性小肠结肠炎,但此处介绍的初步阶段的目标是评估一种新型喂养不耐受和坏死性小肠结肠炎风险评分工具的易用性以及护士对该工具的态度。
在伊利诺伊大学附属的一家拥有48张床位的三级新生儿重症监护病房实施了一种新型风险评分护理工具。在最初的6个月研究期间,经父母同意,从所有早产儿的电子病历中收集数据。在研究现场以及在一次全国新生儿护理会议上由评估人员评估评分准确性(根据电子病历数据选择风险因素的准确性)、易用性以及护士对该工具的态度。
14名护士对63名登记婴儿的166份工具进行了评分。16份工具(9.6%)存在错误。在10分制量表上,研究现场工具的平均易用性为8.1(标准差:2.2)。90%的会议评估人员同意/强烈同意该工具填补了重要的知识空白。
该工具易于使用且受到护士重视。经过验证后,广泛实施有望成为一种临床可行的方法,以最少的时间和财务成本改善婴儿的临床结局。
根据护理反馈对工具进行验证和完善将提高其广泛适用性和预测效用。