Sorhaindo Annik M, Karver Tahilin S, Karver Jonathan G, Garcia Sandra G
Population Council, Mexico City, Mexico.
Population Council, Mexico City, Mexico.
Contraception. 2016 May;93(5):421-31. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
In Mexico, abortion stigma in the general population is largely unexplored. We developed a scale to measure abortion stigma at the community level, examine its prevalence and explore factors associated with abortion stigma in a nationally representative sample.
Following intensive qualitative work to identify dimensions of the stigma construct, we developed a comprehensive list of statements that were cognitively tested and reduced to 33 to form a scale. We piloted the scale in a nationally and subregionally representative household public opinion survey administered to 5600 Mexican residents.
Factor analysis tested the internal consistency and reliability of five previously hypothesized dimensions of abortion stigma: secrecy, religion, autonomy, discrimination and guilt/shame. Under the assumption that these dimensions were independent, confirmatory factor analysis indicated that each of these dimensions functioned as independent subscales. However, to test this assumption, we conducted exploratory factor analysis that revealed a strong codependence between discrimination, guilt/shame and religion statements, resulting in a 23-item four-factor model of abortion stigma and the elimination of the guilt/shame dimension. Both methods revealed a full scale and subscales with Cronbach's alphas between 0.80 and 0.90. Regression analyses suggested that older, less educated individuals living in the north of Mexico report higher levels of stigma, especially related to discrimination and religion.
This community-level abortion stigma scale is the first to be developed and tested in Mexico. This tool may be used in Mexico and other similar country settings to document the prevalence of community-level abortion stigma, identify associated factors and test interventions aimed at reducing abortion stigma.
Abortion stigma prevents women from accessing safe abortion services. Measuring community-level abortion stigma is key to documenting its pervasiveness, testing interventions aimed at reducing it and understanding associated factors. This scale may be useful in countries similar to Mexico to support policymakers, practitioners and advocates in upholding women's reproductive rights.
在墨西哥,普通人群中的堕胎污名化现象在很大程度上尚未得到充分研究。我们开发了一种量表,用于衡量社区层面的堕胎污名化程度,调查其流行情况,并在全国代表性样本中探索与堕胎污名化相关的因素。
在进行了深入的定性研究以确定污名化概念的维度之后,我们编制了一份全面的陈述清单,对其进行了认知测试,并精简至33条以形成一个量表。我们在一项对5600名墨西哥居民进行的全国和地区代表性家庭民意调查中对该量表进行了试点测试。
因子分析检验了先前假设的堕胎污名化五个维度的内部一致性和可靠性:保密性、宗教、自主性、歧视以及内疚/羞耻感。在这些维度相互独立的假设下,验证性因子分析表明,这些维度中的每一个都作为独立的子量表发挥作用。然而,为了检验这一假设,我们进行了探索性因子分析,结果显示歧视、内疚/羞耻感和宗教陈述之间存在很强的相互依存关系,从而形成了一个包含23个条目的堕胎污名化四因素模型,并消除了内疚/羞耻感维度。两种方法都显示完整量表和子量表的克朗巴哈系数在0.80至0.90之间。回归分析表明,居住在墨西哥北部、年龄较大、受教育程度较低的个体报告的污名化程度较高,尤其是与歧视和宗教相关的污名化。
这种社区层面的堕胎污名化量表是首个在墨西哥开发并进行测试的量表。该工具可用于墨西哥及其他类似国家的环境中,以记录社区层面堕胎污名化的流行情况,识别相关因素,并测试旨在减少堕胎污名化的干预措施。
堕胎污名化阻碍了女性获得安全的堕胎服务。衡量社区层面的堕胎污名化是记录其普遍性、测试旨在减少污名化的干预措施以及理解相关因素的关键。该量表可能对与墨西哥类似的国家有用,以支持政策制定者、从业者和倡导者维护女性的生殖权利。