• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估劳动力中的堕胎污名:修订后的堕胎提供者污名量表的开发。

Evaluation of Abortion Stigma in the Workforce: Development of the Revised Abortion Providers Stigma Scale.

机构信息

University of Michigan, Women's and Gender Studies Program & Department of Health & Human Services, Dearborn, Michigan.

University of Michigan, Institute for Research on Women and Gender, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Womens Health Issues. 2018 Jan-Feb;28(1):59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2017.10.004
PMID:29133064
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We report on the development of a scale measuring abortion providers' experiences of stigma.

STUDY DESIGN

Using previous measures, qualitative data, and expert review, we created a 49-item question pool. We administered questions to 315 abortion providers before participation in the Providers Share Workshop. We explored the factor structure and item quality using exploratory factor analysis. We assessed reliability using Cronbach's alpha. To test construct validity, we calculated Pearson's correlation coefficients between the stigma scales, the Maslach Burnout Inventory, and the K10 measure of psychological distress. We used Stata SE/12.0 for analyses.

RESULTS

Factor analysis revealed a 35-item, five-factor model: worries about disclosure, internalized states, social judgment, social isolation, and discrimination (Cronbach's alphas 0.79-0.94). Our stigma measure was correlated with psychological distress (r = 0.40; p < .001), and with Maslach Burnout Inventory's emotional exhaustion (r = 0.27; p < .001), and depersonalization (0.23; p < .001) subscales, and was inversely correlated with Maslach Burnout Inventory's personal accomplishment subscale (r = -0.15; p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Psychometric analysis of this scale reveals that it is a reliable and valid tool for measuring stigma in abortion providers, and may be helpful in evaluating stigma reduction programs.

摘要

目的

我们报告了一种衡量堕胎提供者耻辱感的量表的开发情况。

研究设计

使用先前的测量方法、定性数据和专家审查,我们创建了一个包含 49 个项目的问题库。我们在堕胎提供者参加 Providers Share Workshop 之前向 315 名堕胎提供者发放了这些问题。我们通过探索性因素分析探讨了因子结构和项目质量。我们使用 Cronbach's alpha 评估可靠性。为了检验构念效度,我们计算了耻辱量表、Maslach 倦怠量表和 K10 心理困扰量表之间的 Pearson 相关系数。我们使用 Stata SE/12.0 进行分析。

结果

因素分析显示,有一个包含 35 个项目的五因子模型:对披露的担忧、内化状态、社会判断、社会孤立和歧视(Cronbach's alpha 为 0.79-0.94)。我们的耻辱感量表与心理困扰(r=0.40;p<.001)以及 Maslach 倦怠量表的情绪耗竭(r=0.27;p<.001)和去人性化(0.23;p<.001)分量表相关,与 Maslach 倦怠量表的个人成就感分量表呈负相关(r=-0.15;p<.05)。

结论

该量表的心理计量学分析表明,它是衡量堕胎提供者耻辱感的可靠有效工具,可能有助于评估减少耻辱感的项目。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Abortion Stigma in the Workforce: Development of the Revised Abortion Providers Stigma Scale.评估劳动力中的堕胎污名:修订后的堕胎提供者污名量表的开发。
Womens Health Issues. 2018 Jan-Feb;28(1):59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
2
The stigma of having an abortion: development of a scale and characteristics of women experiencing abortion stigma.堕胎的污名:量表的编制及经历堕胎污名女性的特征。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013 Jun;45(2):79-88. doi: 10.1363/4507913. Epub 2013 May 2.
3
Measuring stigma among abortion providers: assessing the Abortion Provider Stigma Survey instrument.衡量堕胎提供者中的污名化现象:评估《堕胎提供者污名化调查问卷》工具
Women Health. 2014;54(7):641-61. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2014.919981.
4
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale: a methodological study.土耳其版个体层面堕胎耻辱感量表的信度和效度:一项方法学研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e024686. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024686.
5
Relationship of job role and clinic type to perceived stigma and occupational stress among abortion workers.工作角色和诊所类型与堕胎工作者感知污名和职业压力的关系。
Contraception. 2018 Dec;98(6):517-521. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
6
Stigma related to contraceptive use and abortion in Kenya: scale development and validation.肯尼亚与避孕和堕胎相关的污名:量表的制定与验证。
Reprod Health. 2019 Sep 6;16(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0799-1.
7
Developing a scale to measure stigmatizing attitudes and beliefs about women who have abortions: results from Ghana and Zambia.开发一个用于衡量对堕胎女性的污名化态度和观念的量表:来自加纳和赞比亚的结果。
Women Health. 2014;54(7):599-616. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2014.919982.
8
Abortion providers, stigma and professional quality of life.堕胎服务提供者、污名化与职业生活质量。
Contraception. 2014 Dec;90(6):581-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
9
Abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly: Psychometric properties of a German version of the individual level abortion stigma scale.胎儿畸形诊断后的堕胎:个体堕胎耻辱感量表德语版的心理测量学特性。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 12;13(6):e0197986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197986. eCollection 2018.
10
The reliability and validity of three-item screening measures for burnout: Evidence from group-employed health care practitioners in upstate New York.三项目筛查措施用于评估倦怠的可靠性和有效性:来自纽约州北部群体就业医护人员的证据。
Stress Health. 2018 Feb;34(1):187-193. doi: 10.1002/smi.2762. Epub 2017 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of stigma amongst healthcare professionals working in abortion care: a global survey.从事堕胎护理工作的医护人员的耻辱感经历:一项全球调查。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar 15;51(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202468.
2
Providers' experiences with abortion care: A scoping review.提供者实施堕胎护理的体验:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 1;19(7):e0303601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303601. eCollection 2024.
3
"": Opportunities and challenges for full spectrum care among doulas in Georgia.《佐治亚州导乐全方位护理的机遇与挑战》
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Mar 1;4:966208. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.966208. eCollection 2023.
4
Abortion terminology preferences: a cross-sectional survey of people accessing abortion care.堕胎术语偏好:一项对接受堕胎护理的人的横断面调查。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Jan 19;23(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02152-8.
5
Providers' Experience of Abortion Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review.提供者的堕胎护理经验:范围审查方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Feb 2;11(2):e35481. doi: 10.2196/35481.
6
Exploring Experiences Responding to the Individual Level Abortion Stigma Scale: Methodological Considerations From In-depth Interviews.探索对个体层面堕胎耻辱感量表的回应经历:来自深度访谈的方法学考量
Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Jun 10;2:678101. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.678101. eCollection 2021.
7
Regulating Conscientious Objection to Legal Abortion in Argentina: Taking into Consideration Its Uses and Consequences.规范阿根廷对合法堕胎的良心拒服兵役行为:考虑其用途和后果
Health Hum Rights. 2020 Dec;22(2):271-283.
8
Stigma and abortion complications: stories from three continents.耻辱感与堕胎并发症:来自三大洲的故事。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019 Nov;27(3):1688917. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2019.1688917.