强直性脊柱炎与胸腰椎骨折患者矢状位脊柱骨盆对线的比较。
Comparison of Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis and Thoracolumbar Fracture.
作者信息
Pan Tao, Qian Bang-Ping, Qiu Yong
机构信息
From the Medical School of Southeast University (TP); and Department of Spine Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China (B-PQ, YQ).
出版信息
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jan;95(4):e2585. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002585.
This article is a comparative study. The aim of the study is to investigate the difference of sagittal alignment of the pelvis and spine between patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and thoracolumbar fracture, and to evaluate the role of sacropelvic component in AS patients' adaption to the changes in sagittal alignment. Advanced stages of AS are often associated with thoracolumbar kyphosis, resulting in an abnormal spinopelvic balance and pelvic morphology, whereas thoracolumbar fractures may lead to major kyphosis with a potential compromise of the spinal canal, which can cause an abnormal spinopelvic balance. Until now, the comparison of that sagittal alignment between AS and thoracolumbar fracture is not found in the literature. This study included 30 cases of AS and 30 cases of thoracolumbar fracture. Sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters were measured from the standing lateral radiograph, and the following 11 radiological parameters were measured, including global kyphosis (GK), thoracic kyphosis (TK), C7 tilt (C7T), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), spino-pelvic angle (SSA), lumbar lordosis (LL), upper arc of lumbar lordosis (ULL), lower arc of lumbar lordosis (LLL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacrum slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and T9 tilt (T9T). Analysis of variance was used in the comparison of each dependent variable between the 2 cohorts. The relationship between sagittal spinal alignment and pelvic morphology of AS patients was determined via Pearson correlation coefficient (r). Compared with the thoracolumbar fracture group, AS patients had significantly lower C7T, SSA, LL, LLL and SS (78.3° ± 9.3° vs 88.0° ± 2.7°, P < 0.001 for C7T; 91.6° ± 22.7° vs 119.1° ± 9.0°, P < 0.001 for SSA; 20.7° ± 21.0° vs 36.3° ± 16.8°, P = 0.001 for LL; 18.1° ± 11.9° vs 29.0° ± 9.7°, P < 0.001 for LLL; and 18.1° ± 11.9° vs 29.0° ± 9.7°, P < 0.001 for SS), whereas in terms of SVA and PT, AS patients had an obviously higher value than those of thoracolumbar fracture patients (94.5 mm ± 58.4 mm vs 8.0 mm ± 23.3 mm, P < 0.001 for SVA; and 26.5° ± 10.3° vs 17.5° ± 6.6°, P < 0.001 for PT). In AS patients, SS were found to be significantly correlated with SVA, SSA, and LL (r = -0.312, P < 0.05 for SVA; r = 0.475, P < 0.05 for SSA; r = 0.809, P < 0.001 for LL). In our study, there were significant differences in sagittal alignment of the pelvis and spine between patients with AS and thoracolumbar fracture, and changes in pelvic morphology compensated more in AS patients for a thoracolumbar kyphosis. These findings may be helpful for better understanding of sagittal alignment in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS.
本文是一项对比研究。该研究的目的是调查强直性脊柱炎(AS)继发胸腰椎后凸患者与胸腰椎骨折患者骨盆和脊柱矢状位排列的差异,并评估骶骨盆组成部分在AS患者适应矢状位排列变化中的作用。AS的晚期常伴有胸腰椎后凸,导致脊柱骨盆平衡和骨盆形态异常,而胸腰椎骨折可能导致严重后凸并可能累及椎管,进而引起脊柱骨盆平衡异常。目前,尚未在文献中发现AS与胸腰椎骨折之间矢状位排列的比较。本研究纳入了30例AS患者和30例胸腰椎骨折患者。从站立位侧位X线片测量脊柱和骨盆矢状位参数,测量了以下11项影像学参数,包括全脊柱后凸(GK)、胸椎后凸(TK)、C7倾斜角(C7T)、矢状垂直轴(SVA)、脊柱骨盆角(SSA)、腰椎前凸(LL)、腰椎前凸上弧(ULL)、腰椎前凸下弧(LLL)、骨盆入射角(PI)、骶骨倾斜角(SS)、骨盆倾斜角(PT)和T9倾斜角(T9T)。采用方差分析比较两组各因变量。通过Pearson相关系数(r)确定AS患者脊柱矢状位排列与骨盆形态之间的关系。与胸腰椎骨折组相比,AS患者的C7T、SSA、LL、LLL和SS明显更低(C7T:78.3°±9.3° vs 88.0°±2.7°,P<0.001;SSA:91.6°±22.7° vs 119.1°±9.0°,P<0.001;LL:20.7°±21.0° vs 36.3°±16.8°,P=0.001;LLL:18.1°±11.9° vs 29.0°±9.7°,P<0.001;SS:18.1°±11.9° vs 29.0°±9.7°,P<0.001),而在SVA和PT方面,AS患者的值明显高于胸腰椎骨折患者(SVA:94.5 mm±58.4 mm vs 8.0 mm±23.3 mm,P<0.001;PT:26.5°±10.3° vs 17.5°±6.6°,P<0.001)。在AS患者中,发现SS与SVA、SSA和LL显著相关(SVA:r=-0.312,P<0.05;SSA:r=0.475,P<0.05;LL:r=0.809,P<0.001)。在我们的研究中,AS患者与胸腰椎骨折患者在骨盆和脊柱矢状位排列上存在显著差异,并且骨盆形态的变化在AS患者中对胸腰椎后凸的代偿作用更大。这些发现可能有助于更好地理解AS继发胸腰椎后凸患者的矢状位排列情况。
相似文献
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016-1
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012-5-20
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018-11-1
引用本文的文献
本文引用的文献
Clin Spine Surg. 2017-7
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012-5-20
Eur Spine J. 2011-8-26
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009-8-1