Fei Han, Li Wei-Shi, Sun Zhuo-Ran, Ma Qing-Wei, Chen Zhong-Qiang
Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Orthop Surg. 2017 Aug;9(3):271-276. doi: 10.1111/os.12340.
Few studies have concentrated on the sagittal alignment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH), especially the parameters of the pelvis, and controversy exists about whether pelvic morphology is involved in the pathogenesis of LDH. The present study analyzed the characteristics of the sagittal alignment in young Chinese LDH patients and explored the impact of pelvic morphology on the pathogenesis of LDH.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 100 young patients with LDH (69 men and 31 women, aged 18-35 years), and the clinical and imaging findings met the criteria for the diagnosis of LDH. The control group included 100 asymptomatic volunteers with matching age and gender. Coronal and sagittal parameters were measured on the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the whole spine, including lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and sagittal balance (SVA). The cases were classified into four types by the apex position of lumbar lordosis (type I, L or the L intervertebral space; type II, bottom or middle of L ; type III, upper part of L or the intervertebral space between L and L ; type IV, L or more high level), and divided into three groups by PI; namely, a low PI group (PI < 40°), a medium PI group (40° ≤ PI < 50°), and a high PI group (PI ≥ 50°). The sagittal parameters, especially PI, were compared between the LDH group and the control group. Correlations between the parameters in the LDH group were analyzed.
The PI value of the LDH group was not different from that of the control group (46.1° ± 10.0° vs 47.2° ± 8.8°, P > 0.05). The LDH group showed lower average LL, SS, and TK (P < 0.01), as well as higher PT and SVA compared with the control group (P < 0.01). The LL (34.4° ± 15.3° vs 50.8° ± 10.2°) and SVA (21.6 ± 53.6 mm vs - 18.4 ± 32.8 mm) showed a significant difference (P < 0.01); LL was correlated with PI, SS, PT, TK and SVA (P < 0.01); and SVA was also correlated with the parameters above (P < 0.01) except PI (P > 0.05), and the lordosis apex tended to be higher. The distributions of PI groups between the LDH group and the control group were not different. Pairwise correlations were found among LL, PI, SS, and PT. In addition, TK and SVA were correlated with LL, SS, and PT.
There is no difference in PI between young Chinese patients with lumbar disc herniation and the normal population. Young LDH patients may present flat lumbar and thoracic curves, as well as lower sacral slope. The anteversion sagittal imbalance is regulated by both the spine and the pelvis.
很少有研究关注腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的矢状面排列,尤其是骨盆参数,并且关于骨盆形态是否参与LDH的发病机制存在争议。本研究分析了中国年轻LDH患者矢状面排列的特征,并探讨了骨盆形态对LDH发病机制的影响。
对100例年轻LDH患者(69例男性和31例女性,年龄18 - 35岁)进行回顾性分析,其临床和影像学表现符合LDH诊断标准。对照组包括100名年龄和性别匹配的无症状志愿者。在全脊柱的前后位和侧位X线片上测量冠状面和矢状面参数,包括腰椎前凸(LL)、骨盆入射角(PI)、骶骨倾斜角(SS)、骨盆倾斜角(PT)、胸椎后凸(TK)和矢状面平衡(SVA)。根据腰椎前凸顶点位置将病例分为四种类型(I型,L或L椎间隙;II型,L底部或中部;III型,L上部或L与L椎间隙;IV型,L或更高节段),并根据PI分为三组;即低PI组(PI < 40°)、中PI组(40°≤PI < 50°)和高PI组(PI≥50°)。比较LDH组和对照组之间的矢状面参数,尤其是PI。分析LDH组参数之间的相关性。
LDH组的PI值与对照组无差异(46.1°±10.0°对47.2°±8.8°,P>0.05)。与对照组相比,LDH组的平均LL、SS和TK较低(P < 0.01),PT和SVA较高(P < 0.01)。LL(34.4°±15.3°对50.8°±10.2°)和SVA(21.6±53.6mm对 - 18.4±32.8mm)有显著差异(P < 0.01);LL与PI、SS、PT、TK和SVA相关(P < 0.01);SVA除与PI无关(P>0.05)外,也与上述参数相关(P < 0.01),且前凸顶点倾向于更高。LDH组和对照组之间PI组的分布无差异。LL、PI、SS和PT之间存在两两相关性。此外,TK和SVA与LL、SS和PT相关。
中国年轻腰椎间盘突出症患者与正常人群的PI无差异。年轻LDH患者可能表现为腰椎和胸椎曲线变平,以及骶骨倾斜角降低。矢状面前倾失衡由脊柱和骨盆共同调节。