Peters U H
Psyche (Stuttg). 1989 Sep;43(9):830-48.
The author re-examines the significance of the Emma-Eckstein-episode and the Irma-dream with their implications for the theory of psychoanalysis. He follows Eissler and contradicts Schur in his argument that the identity of Irma with Emma cannot be proven and is, in any case, improbable. Neither the proof nor the refutation of this identity are of vital significance for psychoanalytic theory, but only for the suppression of dynamic psychiatry in favour of biological psychiatry.
作者重新审视了爱玛 - 埃克斯坦事件及伊尔玛之梦的意义，以及它们对精神分析理论的影响。他追随艾斯勒的观点，反驳了舒尔的论点，即伊尔玛与爱玛的身份无法得到证实，而且无论如何都不太可能。对于精神分析理论而言，证明或反驳这种身份并不具有至关重要的意义，而仅对于压制动力精神病学以支持生物精神病学具有重要意义。
